I’m going to assume most angry, uninformed, illiterate replies I see on here come from Russian bot farms.
I’d rather believe that than that fellow citizens are so fucking stupid.
Yes, I’ll be blocking them all.
Trump’s name appears over 38,000 times in over 5,800 documents in the Epstein files.
If you printed out those 5,800+ documents on 8.5” x 11” paper and placed them end to end, the Trump Epstein files documents would go from one end of the reflecting pool to the other, then back to the start, and then 2/3 of the way back again.
FBI records obtained through a Judicial Watch lawsuit reveal that a Butler County Sheriff’s deputy exchanged two emails with Trump shooter Thomas Crooks before the July 13, 2024 assassination attempt. The records remain heavily redacted, concealing the nature of the communications. The documents also reveal a SWAT officer recovered a cell phone and a remote device with an antenna from Crooks after he was killed.
Here's everything you might want to know, I hope, about DOJ's inquiry into "the E Jean Carroll lawsuits"—"a grotesque abuse of a compromised and debased Justice Department."
https://t.co/BsHs8pPRjU
Dear Scott Pelley: pull the entire 60 Minutes team together and go to MSNow and offer a package deal to recreate the show for Sunday night and call it The Hour
Joe Biden stood by his son through his entire time as an addict.
Donald Trump chose golf over his son's wedding.
One is a father. The other is a mother******.
🚨 The House just voted 218-204 to move forward on the discharge petition to provide military aid to Ukraine and impose tough sanctions on Russia. The House will vote on final passage tomorrow. This is our Churchill moment and we must pass the test.
@MagaPatrio44812@RepMcGovern@DAGToddBlanche I'm not sure if you're mentally deficient due to insanity or stupidity or some combination thereof.
But I do know that you're blocked.
🚨BREAKING: The Secretary of Homeland Security just admitted, on camera, that he is going to violate your First Amendment right to free speech.
He said, “I have ZERO tolerance. If you verbally assault our officers… we will find you, we will arrest you.”
Except… that’s not how the First Amendment works.
Unless someone is making a credible threat of violence, speech… even rude, angry, or insulting speech… is still protected.
That’s the whole point of a free speech clause… to protect the people from situations where those in power don’t like what’s being said.
So, when a top federal official starts framing “verbal assault” as something you can be arrested for, without clearly defining it as an actual threat…
It stops sounding like protecting officers, and starts sounding like a government trying to silence people who speak out against it.