@jackwshepherd We agree. Sometimes we want to add "And always write it as if normal people would read it, too". The chances it gets to its true users (business folks, customers, etc.) are much higher than it ends up with a judge.
Discovered Web Design Museum. Check out how Google, SpaceX, YouTube, Apple, Lego, and other folks upgraded their UI/UX design through time. The same should happen to legal tech.
Link: https://t.co/E9lRHinlwU
Any doc automation project would benefit immensely if started with legal design and standardization. Smartly designed documents improve legal tech adoption and show extra value.
Today’s documents are largely incompatible with legal innovation. It’s always a challenge to automate documents with too many options and inter-dependencies in them, with walls of text and low standardization across hundreds of templates.
#LegalDesign#LegalTech#ContractOne
https://t.co/8gEV8o1pbM leaves no chance to confuse versions. Whatever you do, you’re in the right version but have full access to the entire history of negotiations—who did what, and when.
Isn’t this magic?
#ContractOne#Versioning
Business guy: you didn’t tell me not to forward that email!
Me: i marked it “privileged and confidential”
Biz: say “do not forward” if that’s what you mean. I’m not a mind reader
@PeterPmoran@peer_legal@PeterPmoran regarding your comment on benefits ending with sending the document by email. With our Continuity feature you can enjoy all the magic even if the other party is not using https://t.co/8gEV8o1pbM yet.
@PeterPmoran@peer_legal “There is no risk of amendments being missed through not being included in the tracked-changes as every change to the agreement will always be shown.”
@PeterPmoran@peer_legal “This can greatly speed up the review process and reduces the need to rely on mark-ups and track change to monitor contract evolution.”
What if https://t.co/8gEV8o1pbM existed in 1987 when U2 wrote “With or Without You”?
What song would you to re-negotiate?
#negotiations#legaltech#ContractOne