Hi everybody. Welcome to the release of the second lecture from my extensive tour archives. We’ve been working together late at night when my symptoms recede enough so that I can finally concentrate to make this release a possibility.
At the same time recently, I've been able to write a little bit and I'm working on three essays at the moment, which I hope to finish and release in the near future. One deals with the climate lies propagated by the socialists and the leftists. Another deals with the issue of the alphabet mafia and the associated Pride movement. And the final one deals with the so-called “rape gangs” in the UK, asking whether the terminology “rape gang”, which is definitely an improvement over “grooming gang”, is sufficient to accurately describe the magnitude of the crimes that are being committed.
In any case, I'm working on these now, hoping to contribute something to the ongoing public debate about these crucially important issues. I'm unhappy with my silence, however necessitated it might be by the conditions of my illness. I would like to get back to.
Thanks for your time and attention. I hope you enjoy listening to this second lecture as much as I enjoyed delivering it.
This is the second lecture from the We Who Wrestle With God tour.
What does it mean that your God is whatever you put first? Why are the stories that grip you not false but hyper-real? Why is work identical to sacrifice, and what does that reveal about the nature of the covenantal relationship between humanity and the spirit of being? What happened when Cain offered his second rate effort and why is that same temptation available to every one of us in every decision we make? What is the story of Job really about? And what is the one promise that runs through the entire biblical corpus for those who are willing to offer their best?
These are not abstract questions. They are the questions that determine the structure of your life whether you answer them consciously or not.
Lecture filmed in Adler Theatre in Davenport, Iowa on February 18, 2024.
“You need to be competent and dangerous.”
Jordan Peterson says the alternative is weakness, and weak people break. The school shooters? They’re weak. Real strength means having the capacity for danger but choosing peace. The “meek shall inherit the earth” actually means those who have swords and know how to use them, but keep them sheathed.
If you’re harmless because you’re weak, there’s no virtue in it. Strength is what makes goodness possible.
What’s your take, do you agree that young men especially need to embrace this idea of strength?
Jordan Peterson’s secret to remembering decades of complex ideas:
The ancient Memory Castle (Method of Loci).
Pick a familiar place, turn information into vivid images, and mentally “place” them in different rooms. Walk through the house to recall it all. He’s been building and refining his internal map for 40 years.
The method of loci is one of the most effective memory techniques ever studied. Research shows it dramatically improves recall, even allowing trained users to remember hundreds of items with near-perfect accuracy, by leveraging the brain’s powerful spatial memory systems.
Hi, everybody.
I’m pleased to let you know that we’re going to release a lecture a week from my extensive tour archive, beginning this Sunday and then repeating every Sunday after that.
This allows me to do something interesting and useful while I’m otherwise incapacitated. My health is such at the moment that I can’t really return to podcasting or public lecturing. But we recorded these with the express intention of preparing them for release, and we’ve all determined that this is a very good time to do that.
So that’s what’s going to happen.
I hope you find them useful and compelling. They’ll be particularly attractive to those of you who liked my early YouTube work that was very lecture focused. It’s a return to my roots, I suppose, in some ways. And I’m as happy as I can be under the current circumstances, given my ill health, to be participating in this process and to have these lectures prepared for release.
Thanks a lot for your continued attention and support.
- Dr. Jordan B. Peterson
Jordan Peterson’s method for remembering everything you read:
Stop highlighting. Stop taking notes while reading.
Read a section → close the book → write down what you remember in your own words. Reformulate it. Connect it. Criticize it.
That’s how information actually becomes part of you.
What’s your take, do you learn and retain more by actively recalling and rewriting, or by highlighting and passive note-taking?
This is one of Tucker's most explosive interviews about Trump, Iran, and who is actually in control of the U.S
He said Trump was pressured into a war he didn't want, knew it was a bad idea, understood it could wreck his presidency and blow up the global economy... and did it anyway.
Not because he was fooled or misinformed, but because he couldn't stop it.
Think about what that means.
Trump spent years campaigning against forever wars. If he understood the risks of attacking Iran, hated the idea of another Middle East disaster, and yet ended up there anyway, then the story isn't about Trump.
It's about the forces that were able to move him so far away from his campaign promises and values.
And Tucker goes there.
He talks about the donors, Netanyahu, the pressure Trump was put under, and how he changed after the Butler shooting.
He also talks about why he believes he'll eventually be silenced.
And then, right in the middle of the interview, Trump posts that peace may finally be on the table.
So the whole conversation suddenly becomes something bigger: Can Trump still break free? Can he actually walk away?
Or was the moment everyone voted for in 2024 already lost long ago?
Whether you agree with Tucker or not, this isn't some recycled Fox News talking-point session.
This is asking a question that almost nobody in mainstream politics is willing to ask:
If the most powerful man in the world can't do what he wants, then who the hell is actually in charge?
@TuckerCarlson, @TCNetwork
🚨New Paper: "Seven Years of 700 Cholesterol Without Coronary Atherosclerosis: A Lean Mass Hyper-Responder Case Report"
Link: https://t.co/5VnRpZlFdR
For the past 7 years, I’ve been running what is essentially a natural experiment in cholesterol and heart health.
During that time, I’ve largely lived with:
👉Total cholesterol around 700 mg/dl
👉LDL cholesterol between 500–600 mg/dL
I recently underwent advanced coronary CT angiography imaging with AI-guided analysis. This is not a CAC. It measures all plaque (soft + calcified), with expert interpretation and AI-guided analysis capable of quantifying plaque down to the cubic millimeter (mm3).
Now, to address the obvious question:
Am I too young for plaque?
In brief: No.
The clearest comparison is individuals with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, who often have similarly extreme LDL/ApoB levels and can develop advanced plaque as toddlers, and even heart attacks as early as age 8.
Also, nutrition influencers in their 30s have publicly shared quantified plaque scores from these same imaging technologies. In one recent case, a plant-based influencer in his thirties was found to have 61.3 mm³ of plaque despite having far lower lifetime LDL exposure. (He can identify himself if he so chooses.)
My case also isn’t a one-off.
There are many individuals like me, including older individuals with similar LDL-C and ApoB without any plaque.
The difference is that I’m an unusually well-characterized subject, with extensive metabolic data and health markers tracked over time. You can learn more at the newsletter or open-access paper, linked above.
The science of heart health is not settled. And cholesterol is not a simple story.
🚨 If you want to help spread the word...
Quote Tweet this post (or create an original post) including the article link with a thought. Academic papers are increasingly evaluated using attention metrics. Original posts from unique users are one way to increase these metrics and help ultimately increase its reach.
🚨 If you want to learn more, I'll include more learning resources below 👇
When I first saw the hantavirus story I thought: given it's a single stranded RNA virus, Ivermectin is very likely to work--because IVM is effective with RNA viruses generally. Look what happened when I pursued it with Claude.
It clammed up, for "safety" reasons.
Buckle up!
In Canada the government told pregnant women and nursing mothers that the injections were “safe and effective”.
In January 2022, @OttawaPolice Detective Helen Grus found that infants were dying at triple the normal rate. Police command shut down her investigation, seized her files and computer - and suspended her.
Police then illegally wiretapped Grus and her family members, and charged Grus with launching an “unauthorized investigation” into public health officials.
She was convicted of ‘Discreditable Conduct” by an internal kangaroo tribunal - to intimidate Grus and to deter other police officers from investigating any potential connection between the Covid vaccines and infant deaths.
Grus’s sentencing hearing starts May 19, 2026.
The major documentary ‘Silencing Detective Grus’ premiers in Ottawa the night before.
Trailer and tickets- https://t.co/DuI40bdXyH
The sudden and inexplicable speech by Melania -- denying she was Epstein's "victim," that he introduced her to Trump, that she had a relationship with him, and urging more investigation and disclosure -- is one of the most bizarre events, especially at this point in the war.
Pretty sure I have the second published interview of Joe Kent @joekent16jan19 since his resignation. Give the algorithm a nudge and RT for me, wouldja?