@Wiki_Leak3 If you come into the country illegally, you have broken our laws and it has consequences. Not doing anything is a slap in the face to those who have abided by the law, followed the proper protocol and worked legally to gain citizenship. It’s really that simple.
Feed hungry- is there a Muslim NGO that helps? Seems most assistance comes from Christian orgs. And we do already have welfare & charities. Health- guess he will walk beside Obamacare that y’all rejoiced. Hospitals don’t deny emergencies. Will he keep the borders closed so illegal drugs don’t saturate our communities? Will he follow other democrat cities and hand out drugs and needles to addicts? Housing- will he keep border closed so housing industry isn’t oversaturated will demand? Some people would rather do drugs and not work. Love & be loved— who has been the most violent, belligerent, and hate filled the past 10 years. I know you won’t admit it is woke left. Does he love Christians and patriotic Americans? Will he imprison law breakers? People who cheat the system via fraud, come here illegally are law breakers. Will he honor the US Constitution to which he took an oath or will sharia law and Islam take precedence? We cannot have both!
🚨NEW: Stephen A. Smith: "Let me get this straight: If I'm a person in New York who wants to get anywhere from $19 to $30 an hour to shovel snow, I need 2 forms of ID. But Democrats are arguing on Capitol Hill, 'Why should you need ID to vote?' Make it make sense."
@DailyCaller
@_Zaraquin A president who refuses to send aid to states that harbor illegal immigrants and break the laws of the country is upholding law and order, following laws, protecting tax payer money.
Holy crap.
They said the Covid vaccine had a 12.6% miscarriage rate for pregnant women but it was actually 82%.
Fauci and his co-conspirators need to be thrown in jail.
Fight? Why don’t you fight for Californians who don’t want crap in front of their stores. Or their tax dollars being embezzled and misused. Or safe streets. Or lower taxes. Or maybe not having their hard earned massive taxation not go to illegal immigrants and actually citizen residents of CA. Or how about rather than pass a bill against the people finding the FRAUD and put people in prison FOR COMMITTING THE FRAUD.. or would you and LA Mayor be included in that fraud?
I read this on Insta and it hit hard: 153 Muslims ran in the midterms. 89 secured victories in 25 states. This is how Sharia law infiltrates the system.
I’m a mother, wife, daughter, and sister—and an American patriot. I’ve watched the United Kingdom fall to Muslim invaders. I will not stand by and risk my children (or myself) being r*ped, harmed, or k*lled because we allowed Muslim radicals into our country.
If that makes me Islamophobic, so be it. I want to live free from the constant threat of foreign invaders.
This is preventable. Stop letting them immigrate into America.
Gee I dunno... could it be because he said women on October 7th deserved to be raped? Or that America deserved 911? Or that we should kill capitalists and let the streets soak in their blood? Or that refugees who escaped communist regimes can suck his c*ck. @RollingStone you're disgusting for laundering this madness.
Vance on Abdul El-Sayed: "He's gone after my kids! He's an odd guy. It's telling that instead of talking about what to do to make Michiganders better, he takes personal insults at me. The guy's crazy and would be a terrible senator"
CLARENCE THOMAS JUST PUBLISHED THE EXACT ARGUMENT FOR WHY THE SUPREME COURT'S BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP RULING IS CONSTITUTIONALLY WRONG
Not a political objection. Not a policy disagreement. NAMED HISTORY. SPECIFIC TEXT. Amendment by amendment.
📜 14th Amendment, 1868 — "ONE pervading purpose": securing equal citizenship for FREED SLAVES after the Civil War
📜 Reconstruction Congress intent — zero evidence the drafters contemplated children of foreign temporary visitors or illegal aliens
📜 "Subject to the jurisdiction" clause — Thomas: means full political allegiance, not mere physical presence on US soil
📜 The majority opinion — Thomas says it REPURPOSED the Amendment to protect preferred rights the drafters NEVER contemplated
📜 Thomas's direct quote — those rights "CANNOT find support in the text today"
📜 His warning on the ruling — "I am not sure that today's opinion will stand the test of time"
📜 Thomas during April 2026 oral arguments — probed whether immigration debates even existed when the 14th was written
📜 His core distinction — freed slaves were entitled to citizenship because they were Americans with no other homeland; children of foreign nationals are not in the same category
📜 Roberts and Barrett — joined the liberal bloc in the 6-3 majority in Trump v. Barbara
📜 Gorsuch — joined Thomas in dissent; Alito filed a separate dissent
💀 91 pages
💀 1 purpose the 14th Amendment actually had, per Thomas
💀 ZERO rights the Reconstruction Congress contemplated for children of foreign nationals
💀 100% of Thomas's argument grounded in the specific post-Civil War historical record — not modern policy preference
Every argument on this list is anchored in the text and history of the Amendment. Not in what the Court wishes it said. In what the people who wrote it actually intended.
The Court's ruling stands. But Thomas put a 91-page marker on the record.
Thomas's dissent is still ticking. These are the arguments at the core of it.
I'll keep you updated as this unfolds, turn on notifications this is EXTREMELY important.
I think most hard working Americans would give the shirt off their backs to help someone in need. But not to be taken advantage of, enable laziness, and further drug use. There are limits to charity. Health care? Difficult topic but as long as we have greedy lawyers, top heavy administrators, a lack of common sense, a questionably corrupt insurance complex, IRRESPONSIBLE HUMANS who continue to feed their bodies with crap, and NOW another level of admin costs with Obamacare— it will continue to be a broken system where those who can afford massive insurance costs cover all these issues.