“Whether you like it or not, young men are predominantly the people that build the buildings, that fight the fires, that police the streets and fight the wars.”
@NickJFreitas spoke at ARC 2026 about how society failed young men and the need to fix this.
If white Christian men had systematically raped 250,000 brown children for a decade, it would be the biggest scandal of half a century.
But because brown Muslim men did it to white children, the authorities continue covering it up, and media continues refusing to talk about it.
This is one of the best takedowns of Mark Carney I’ve seen.
He’s not a businessman. He’s never run a company. He’s never met a payroll. He’s a lifelong bureaucrat who somehow convinced people he’s some kind of economic genius.
The guy actually went on TV in Atlantic Canada and downplayed steel tariffs because “we don’t use that much steel.” That’s not just tone-deaf — that’s fundamental ignorance of how manufacturing, auto, and resource sectors actually work in this country.
Carney keeps all the worst Trudeau-era policies in place — emissions caps, anti-oil and gas rules, the whole net-zero scam — but now he can personally override them whenever he wants. If those policies were good, why does he need an override button? He’s admitting they’re damaging Canada but refuses to scrap them.
He’s concentrating more power in the PMO than ever, acting like the King of Canada while surrounding himself with the same failed Trudeau retreads. His own caucus is still pushing the climate nonsense that’s been proven to waste billions and make life more expensive for regular people.
Meanwhile, oil and gas — our single biggest export earner — is still being deliberately held back. Provincial trade barriers are still choking the economy. And the same people who created this mess are still in charge, still pocketing money from the climate grift while average Canadians get squeezed.
This government was a failure under Trudeau. Under Carney it’s just a more polished version of the same failure.
Less government. Lower taxes. Cut the red tape. Develop our resources. Stop robbing the middle class to enrich insiders.
That’s the only reset that actually works.
#cdnpoli #CarneyFail #LiberalFail #CanadaFirst
Protected B is 🇨🇦’s security level for documents that cause “serious harm” to gov if made public.
Interesting level for a regulator explaining inflated appraisals & weak home sales to banks, eh?
🇨🇦’s not bailing out a few developers. It’s bailing out the whole system. 🧵👇
What is UNDRIP? United Nations Declaration of Rights for Indigenous People.
You've probably never even heard heard of it, and it's going to destroy Canada.
With @Shawnbuckleylaw
What’s infuriating about the Hantavirus hype is how they’re trying to rewrite the science.
Dr Clare Craig sets the record straight.
That 30% fatality rate is a lie. It was calculated from seriously ill hospital patients, not the general population.
There is no real evidence of human to human transmission. Even between husband and wife there’s at least a 97% chance it wouldn’t spread.
@FoodProfessor A lot of Tim Horton's customers are peeved about its decision to replace Canadians with TWF's behind its counters. If Dunkin' Donuts can tap into that resentment and make a point of hiring Canadians (and Canadian youth) then it may end up with a winning strategy.
@FoodProfessor There should be no carbon tax at all. The whole thing is built on a false premise (multiple false premises in fact). It's not about saving the planet, it never was, it was always about extracting wealth from the population.
Helen Andrews dropped a blunt explanation for why wokeness proved so hard to kill:
It’s rooted in feminine patterns of conflict — where disagreement isn’t debated, it’s treated as emotional harm that must be punished or silenced.
Instead of open argument (like James Damore’s memo at Google), the response became “I can’t believe you said that” followed by attempts to get the person fired. Men tend to argue, resolve, and move on. Women, she argues, are more likely to hold onto grievances.
If wokeness is partly a byproduct of rapid feminization of institutions, Andrews warns it won’t simply vanish with one election. It may be structural.
She points to overly “HR-ified” workplaces where feminine preferences for emotional safety now dominate promotions, culture, and daily life — often sidelining masculine strengths in the process.
Do you think some institutions have become too feminized in ways that suppress open debate and masculine virtues? Or is this framing off-base?
Early Western Settlers in Canada were required build a home, and break at least 30 acres of land (create farmland) each year for 3 years, or they did not get ownership of the land
No one was given the land for "free" they had to pay for it and contribute to retain ownership
Had another interview with a reporter the other day and they asked me about the studies the government has done on the shots collectively given to infants in the first year of life, and whether they used a proper control group of children who didn't receive those shots.
These studies are such a joke. What they end up doing with MMR, for instance, is saying they took children who got all the vaccines except MMR, then all the vaccines plus MMR, and didn't see a statistically significant uptick in autism, and therefore MMR doesn't cause autism.
And that study is fine, if all the other vaccines have already been proven not to cause autism. Then you have a proper control group. But the Institute of Medicine states clearly there is no study that isolates the DTaP vaccine. And the CDC has suspected DTaP since the 1986 Act, which literally listed diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis as being associated with autism and as the first thing that should be investigated once they took on the liability.
That investigation has never happened. I think we should ask ourselves why.
Because if DTaP causes autism, it erases the validity of the MMR study entirely. Your control group had a product in it that can cause autism. That is the problem with the science that has been done so far.
I have had both Dr. Stanley Plotkin and Kathryn Edwards on the stand in front of @AaronSiriSG, two of the most iconic figures in the vaccine space. When asked, listing every vaccine one by one, "Do you have a study showing it doesn't cause autism?" Kathryn Edwards had none.
Stanley Plotkin stated the same thing under oath. What they both explained is that they made an assumption that vaccines don't cause autism. I have that on video on my website. These are the authors of Plotkin's Vaccines, considered the bible on vaccinations.
So if your top vaccine scientists cannot provide a single study under oath, why are newspapers reporting there are mountains of evidence? I sued the CDC. I said show me the trials you relied upon for the first six vaccines in the first six months of life to conclude they don't cause autism. They had zero. Not for Hepatitis B. Not for polio. Not for DTaP. Zero.
There is no two or three year placebo trial for these products like you would see with every other drug. And that is not an accident. Causation is established in a placebo trial. If you skip that trial, you remove your ability to ever get to causation. You are permanently stuck in the land of "associated with."
And the agency that is required to do the safety studies is the same agency defending itself in court against me. They are not doing the science, so you cannot win. That is where we are.
Climate blogger @LLBiggers relives the moment she realized her alarmist worldview was absurd.
It was during the pandemic. It's fun watching people take the blinders off to see what's in front of their very eyes.
Wow!
A university of Winnipeg professor presented a totally FACTUAL and scientifically rigorous course
...on RACE, IQ and violence
and NO ONE knows what do to about it.
@AndrewLawton She's trying to delete/scrub this this a.m. here you go; I downloaded it knowing she'd try. So I'm ensuring it's reviewed/seen so Canadians can decide what the next step is
This isn’t a theory or just my political opinion. This is a legal structure. One that I’ve spent 30 years working inside as a constitutional lawyer, first for Health Canada, then against them. Canada's drug laws make it illegal to treat illness with anything the government hasn't pre-approved.
MUST WATCH! This is incredible!
Swine Flu "Pandemic" 1976 investigation by Michael Wallace CBS 60 mins.
How is it that this happened in 1976 with the flu vaccination and then so few questioned the covid shots in 2021?!!!