WinstewartOUT

Surviving Clearlake’s @chelseafc . #raidernation

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@rajsinghchohan Chelsea in the left 10 is the best option

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@RiicoBandzz Ederson Scott and sangare for your midfield rebuild😬

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@irvine75 @Lee__1878 @malpheuse @TFinnAgain Your point deduction

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@LFCLaurie I’d probably say Wirtz and isak because they’re not even football players

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@Emzyl_ Him and fab crazy washed icl

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@MatrixTejlu @raptorAFC @journalism_rp @CFCDaily ‘Already determined there was no sporting advantage’ if there was a sporting advantage determined their statement would’ve reflected it. Not hard to use your brain is it

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@malpheuse @efcanon_ @TFinnAgain Now that I agree with I don’t agree that sporting sanctions should’ve been applied so heavily in your situation.

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@malpheuse @Lee__1878 @TFinnAgain No I’m behind realistic, you can’t make the point that you would hypothetically not drop points to Chelsea if they hadn’t signed x player because there’s 0 evidence of that being the case

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@malpheuse @Lee__1878 @TFinnAgain Chelsea would just say they would’ve beat you anyway because they probably would have ha ha

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@MatrixTejlu @raptorAFC @journalism_rp @CFCDaily Exactly they said nothing about it, so they recognise there was no sporting advantage

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@MatrixTejlu @raptorAFC @journalism_rp @CFCDaily You can go and read the settlement yourself and maybe try and understand it. Good luck to any team trying to argue ‘hazard’ made them not win the league or qualify for the ucl, without a bunch of hypothetical scenarios. What tangible proof is there to back any claims ha ha

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@MatrixTejlu @raptorAFC @journalism_rp @CFCDaily 1. Already determined there was no sporting advantage and psr rules wouldn’t have been broken.
2. That’s impossible to prove as Chelsea will just argue that they could’ve and would’ve signed alternative players providing the same impact

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@malpheuse @Lee__1878 @TFinnAgain Why would Chelsea taking points off you mean anything what could you possibly argue for that

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@raptorAFC @journalism_rp @MatrixTejlu @CFCDaily Well Chelsea will just say where’s the proof that they wouldn’t have signed someone else who would’ve had the same impact

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@Lee__1878 @malpheuse @TFinnAgain Also you finished 4 points above them, minus the 6 points and they would’ve stayed up?

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@Lee__1878 @malpheuse @TFinnAgain It’s pretty simple, a points deduction gives Burnley something tangible to sue against. In Chelsea’s case you’re basing your whole argument on assumptions

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@Lee__1878 @malpheuse @TFinnAgain Well the fact is you got a point deduction which demonstrates you received a sporting advantage and that’s how Burnley went after you

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@malpheuse @TFinnAgain Well you can’t really prove that can you and as I say the ruling decided they didn’t which you can look up yourself

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@Feedtheyak22 @KieranMaguire Maybe because they’re different cases

[WinstewartOUT @CoteDrogba]

@toffeeblue76 @ManwithnonameCD @KieranMaguire Because the ruling was there was no sporting advantage? Any club that would try and make a claim against us would get laughed out the room