Infinite friendly mulligans works at casual friendly tables where good faith is assumed and there's no reason for people to get punished for bad rng
The moment people start abusing that is the moment you no longer have a casual friendly table
@heruvimski Yeah for a lot of common names it really depends who you ask, especially for lesser known animals
Also we have a bunch of cool insect names - vodeni cvet (lat. Ephemeroptera), mrtvački sanduk (type of wood eating beetle), jelenak (stag beetle)
@BalkanAvis Ngl my (limited) experience with research/funding is that the focus is much more on *selling* an idea than the idea itself. The paper needs to justify it's existence as a concept rather than the actual content itself.
@SureZher @sorrelquest It did work well in the beginning but tbh it's not just the time that changed, the writing quality went down significantly after around 2016/17. Projects became much more ambitious and the execution became worse. (And they didn't even give the franchise a dignified sendoff)
@badjicaa "U 21. veku ne postoji opravdanje da trošite besmislene sume novca kako biste se uklopili u evrocentrične standarde lepote koji se plasiraju zbog industrije koja zarađuje na mizoginiji i ljudskim nesigurnostima."
@BalkanAvis Tbh i never understood the whole discourse bc there are so many variables involved - is the bear right next to me? or am i just in a bear populated area? Am i on a trail or lost in the middle of the forest? Like idk my answer would vary for all of those
women are not a monolith and if you ask ten women how they think a man should dress, you may get ten diff answers. some good ideas; some bad. if you have no personal sense of aesthetics, you will not be able to adjudicate btw them. also, not everyone dresses to attract ppl
@ScribblerRigby@sircatticus 2/2 and everybody picked up on it bc they psychologist framed it as this simple illustration of what schizophrenia does to the mind and ppl put it in textbooks bc it's simple to understand and nobody bothered to fact check.
@ScribblerRigby@sircatticus It's been a while since i researched this but afaik a psychiatrist took his works and put them in a specific order to make it look like his art deconstructed as his illness progressed, even though there's no evidence that the paintings were made in that order 1/2