It’s hard to imagine a worse strategy to protect women. By outing the names of the 7 men, the @Cornell Daily newspaper literally all but GUARANTEED the outing of the woman.
I hope it was worth it.
The editors of the Cornell Daily are responsible for the Cornell accuser’s name being publicized. This entire thing started with their hare-brained idea to publish the names of the Cornell 7. Now they are the Cornell 8
@mtracey Girl has consensual but questionable sex.
People: Rape rape rape
Innocent random people catching strays.
People: asking for it, your fault, you did it
What in the world are you talking about? This has nothing to do with either. Her identity was confirmed long before that. Also, just a point of order, I don’t allow parting shots followed by a block. If you want to block me that’s totally fine, but you don’t get to have the last word.
What in the world are you talking about? This has nothing to do with either. Her identity was confirmed long before that. Also, just a point of order, I don’t allow parting shots followed by a block. If you want to block me that’s totally fine, but you don’t get to have the last word.
What in the world are you talking about? This has nothing to do with either. Her identity was confirmed long before that. Also, just a point of order, I don’t allow parting shots followed by a block. If you want to block me that’s totally fine, but you don’t get to have the last word.
@___Branko___
1. 2,169 likes (May 26, 2026) — “Bro is legit near tears. It’s like he’s talking about an old friend who is now homeless and addicted to drugs.” https://t.co/q9qJvG2Ooc
2. 288 likes (Sep 23, 2026) — “The bar chose to pour gasoline on a smoldering fire.” Image attached. https://t.co/3HEddRxK9w
3. 232 likes (Sep 7, 2026) — “He functions as a mirror. Welcome to reality.” https://t.co/WyZIiMuJdd
4. 222 likes (Sep 29, 2026) — On the Cornell names: people outraged that her name was published should have been equally outraged when the Cornell 7’s names were published; either both get some privacy under the presumption of innocence, or neither does. https://t.co/W5qaBj29jx
@24_Snowflakes
Display name: WhyAreMAGAtsSoAngry? About 190 followers. Far fewer high-engagement posts turned up.
1. 49 likes (May 10, 2026) — “Get your eyes checked.” https://t.co/Egrke1xCVD
2. 33 likes (May 31, 2026) — “This is 49? Looks much older. Hate will do that to you.” Image attached. https://t.co/MEt5njQC6L
3. 21 likes (May 31, 2026) — “That’s not how a Lady sits. But maybe she spent a little time with RFK Jr off camera before getting in the golf court.” https://t.co/pGAqCKB06F
4. 16 likes (Jun 13, 2026) — “4 times? Wow!!! You’re a fool. We are out all the time.” https://t.co/QkoY3D2djU
5. 16 likes (Mar 20, 2026) — “#MAGA thinks that nothing happened before #trump. There’s no stupidity like #MAGA stupidity.” https://t.co/4lWy6eHAPj
Nothing from account cleared 50 likes in the searches.
@keny_berd It’s been explained many times by multiple people. There was an error in the court document. The error had nothing to do with the facts of the case. It’s a minor transcription error/discrepancy. Jane Doe is indeed the woman he identified.
No. You didn’t “find” anything. You’re straight up lying. You cannot produce a single reliable source for anything you assert after being asked multiple times. You don’t have “two sources found and multiple more”. You are literally behaving like a child. Everyone knows you’re lying . You’re embarrassing yourself.
Begone - I’m no longer interested in your nonsense.
@knightkatana52@___Branko___@mtracey That’s an editorial written by the same editors of the newspaper that started this nonsense. You also said “we are long past due process”. Are you really willing to see a group of young men go to prison because of a *newspaper editorial*???
There are different methods of synthesizing methamphetamine. If you’ve ever watched the popular television program “Breaking Bad”, you may observe discussions about a “P2P cook”. P2P is short for phenyl-2-propanone, also commonly called phenylacetone.
P2P synthesis is popular with large scale methamphetamine production because it’s scalable - it’s trivial to increase batch size (to a point). The challenge with P2P synthesis is your end product is racemic. This means it has both the left and right molecule. The right molecule is the “good” one, the left molecule has unpleasant side effects (jittery feeling, grinding ones teeth). So the product must be chirally resolved with an acid. That just means separating/filtering out the left and right handed molecules. So it’s an additional step in production.
Conventional clandestine methods use ephedrine or pseudoephedrine as a precursor. You may have heard the television program reference such synthesis as a “pseudo cook”. For example using red phosphorus, iodine and pseudoephedrine. The benefit to these methods is chiral resolution is unnecessary. When you use ephedrine as a precursor you’ve already preselected for the “good” right handed molecule. So there is no need for the final step with the tartaric acid.
However, these conventional methods aren’t as scalable as a P2P synthesis. It’s difficult to increase batch sizes after a certain point. That’s why industrial manufacturing either employs P2P synthesis or another racemic method called the “Birch reaction”.