You can’t do 100% bonus depreciation on a house. They likely got 15% of the total purchase price, 20% of the “improved” value. So, they offset $225k and over the last 4 years, another $75k. Their basis is $1.2MM and by your math, the property is worth $1.2MM.
If they actually depreciated 100% of the property, the problem isn’t depreciatuon recapture, it’s tax fraud.
@DevaultBrad@HunkyDoryTX Yes, but if the DST bought the 10 DG’s at a 7% cap rate, it would be equivalent to the buyer purchasing the same deals at a 5% cap rate.
@DevaultBrad@HunkyDoryTX You buy into a DST for a 22% to 30% premium compared to what they paid for it.
They buy a deal for $10MM, the sell it to the client for $13MM. Instant loss of money.
If it is retail, it’s DG and TSC on flat lease at a 5% cap rate.
@kylematthewsceo@LincolnRiley@uscfb Interns and AIT’s before they’re licensed at Matthews they cold call donors? It’d be a great way for them to figure out if they should actually do the job.
@tyleralley24 Agreed. 70% of net lease deals have inherently too much risk for far too low of a return. Most ground lease structured deals is where you’re rooting for the tenant to fail or leave.