@Athersmike 2/2 to score at 3.2 per over. What reason had England to think they could score at 3.6 over a prolonged period? The chances of victory without a positively heroic contribution were remote and likelyhood of defeat, high. It was a prosaic decision, but a sound one.
@Athersmike 1/2 It’s seems a popular view, but one belied by the figures. New Zealand, with the cushion of a 100 run lead on first innings and every incentive to seek quick runs safe in the knowledge they had precious little chance of loosing the match, were only able...
@anthony_mcgowan I once won a ‘dance off’ by throwing in a bit of Cossack. It was contrived to make me look ridiculous, so I thought I might as well go the whole way.
@anthony_mcgowan Statistics and data are often confused. Data is fact based but can be inaccurately gathered. Statistics is the management of data, but is only as useful as the data is accurate and analysis is rigorous and relevant (which it is often not) but can be akin to prescience when it is.
Be careful what you wish for ‘The document, marked “official sensitive” — requiring security clearance on a “need to know” basis — reveals that 29 of the 33 areas most vulnerable to job losses if the UK crashes out of the European Union voted leave.’