If you have a Gmail account, you need to read this.
Google's AI now scans your emails and attachments, bank statements, tax files, medical letters, all of it. It turned on by default, and there's a class-action lawsuit over how.
Here are 5 moves to shut it off, the switch is hidden in two places:
First target of 10,000 has been reached in 4 days.
Now we have to get to 100,000 for a debate.
If everyone who has signed could please find 9 friends...
If you, or someone you love, has
cancer,
B12 deficiency,
kidney dialysis
or a stent
you need to know they they must now avoid ALL white flour.
They also need to check wholemeal and even gluten free products which also contain folic acid.
Sign this petition to stop it being mandated in flour:
https://t.co/OgdjkgUBHW
Hello @SoilAssociation
Why is folic acid permitted in flour labelled Organic?
It's synthetic, anyone who isn't or won't be pregnant doesn't need it, and it can be harmful to people with certain MTHFR gene mutations (and probably other people too).
Can you tell the government to sod off, and change your rules please?
The petition to stop folic acid entering our flour is on 7,337 votes after three days.
Please keep sharing with friends and family.
If we kept up the current rate we could reach the target by the end of July.
https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7
The UK government spyware demand means that the government decides exactly what should be censored on every mobile device. They say they will start with nude pictures (if you don’t identify yourself as an adult). But it could at any time be expanded to anything the government disapproves of. Today, 30 people are arrested every day in the United Kingdom for writing something online that the government classifies as "grossly offensive". It is obvious that they will use this tool to restrict free speech.
Currently, there appears to be no requirement to report findings outside the device. However, with both legal and technological decision-making power taken away from individuals and transferred to the government, that is only a pen stroke away.
This means that the government could also use this system for total mass surveillance.
And they can do so in secret.
The government recently, in secret, tried to pressure Apple (which is now agreeing to client-side scanning) to build backdoors into its end-to-end encrypted cloud service. They can do this under the Investigatory Powers Act 2016, also known as the "Snoopers' Charter" – a law that makes it illegal for tech companies to disclose secret demands from the government.
‼️ Google is about to disable all adblocker extensions in Chrome. Instead of letting the adblocker inspect traffic itself, extensions now have to hand Google's browser a limited list of filtering rules and hope for the best. This leads to weaker blocking and more ads getting through.
Google makes the vast majority of its money selling ads. The company that profits from every ad you see also controls the browser most people use, with Chrome 149 being the last version supporting adblockers.
For example, under the new rules, uBlock Origin cannot exist. For millions of people, that extension is the only thing standing between them and a wall of ads, trackers, and autoplay garbage. One user put it bluntly: "The web is literally unusable without uBlock Origin."
Article 61 of the Magna Carta 1215 was repealed almost as soon as it was written. It was annulled by Pope Innocent III within 10 weeks of sealing and was omitted from every subsequent reissue and confirmation (1216, 1217, the definitive 1225 version, and Edward I’s 1297 statutory confirmation). It has no legal force today.
This is what the UK spyware proposal means.
There must be government spyware on every mobile device. It shall watch everything that happens, including always watching the screen, looking for things the government disapproves of.
When anything is flagged by the software as something the government doesn't like, the software must block it from being sent or displayed (in realtime).
The user of the device must not be able to shut this watching and blocking off. The only way to shut it off would be to ask the government or its proxies to do so for you, at their discretion.
Therefore the whole device must be locked down. Administrator rights and the decision of what software or operating system to run or not to run must be taken from the owner/user and handed to the government and its proxies.
Apple and Google are themselves working hard to lock down the devices they are involved in to shut out competition and establish a duopoly.
The UK government says it is "working closely" with Apple and Google and currently they synchronise and coordinate their communication on this subject.
The UK government is now proposing to mandate what would otherwise be illegal anti-competitive practices.
@GrapheneOS on the Apple and Google duopoly:
https://t.co/rbRmcUDTRu
Statement from @signalapp
https://t.co/vJILcSrs4s
@ReclaimTheNetHQ on the state spyware:
https://t.co/3FCi06bP77
The government announcement:
https://t.co/ynYjR3DIRo
Please sign this petition to end the addition of the synthetic drug folic acid to our flour.
It's being added with the claim it might prevent ~200 neural tube defects.
The trial that claim is based on resulted in 9 dead babies per 'saved' child.
https://t.co/XzpiIGIzT7
🚨 BREAKING: Keir Starmer threatens mandatory ID checks to use mobile phones
"Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm. This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.
"Put simply, the Labour Government is threatening ID checks for the internet. No one in a democracy should need to show their passport just to get online.
"These plans would replace efforts for meaningful tech and parental responsibility with performative, authoritarian government control that children can easily circumvent by accessing adult-registered devices. However, for the UK's 50 million adults using the internet, this backdoor digital ID requirement would invoke the death of anonymity and internet privacy.
"The Government's plan very likely means that unless you submit to intrusive identity checks when setting up your phone or computer, there will be a chokehold on your software and internet access leaving you with a child-locked device. Planned restrictions on messaging, streaming and browsing raise the potential of spyware in our pockets that will be exploited for other purposes before long.
"The Government mandating that all phones in Britain require ID and surveillance software is a crossing of the Rubicon that would make the UK one of the most authoritarian internet regimes in the world. This extreme technological censorship requires rigorous public and parliamentary scrutiny that is currently totally missing" - Silkie Carlo | @silkiecarlo
RFK Jr: "The phrase 'vaccines are unavoidably unsafe' was written into federal law in 1986 when Congress voted to give vaccine manufacturers full immunity from injury lawsuits."
You have to laugh!
Legacy media spent years destroying Dr Andrew Wakefield for linking gut issues to autism.
Yet now turn around and platform Prof. James Adams and his research linking autism to the gut biome.
What they refused to air is that Adam’s believes vaccines caused his own daughter’s severe autism.
Way to bury the lead!
The Big Pharma stranglehold over media continues. But the truth will out.
Every obedience experiment in history had the same overlooked finding.
Not everyone complied.
In Milgram’s lab, 35% refused to deliver the final shock. In Asch’s line experiments, 25% never conformed, not once, across any trial. In Zimbardo’s prison, at least one guard refused to dehumanize. One prisoner demanded a lawyer instead of a doctor and broke the psychological frame entirely.
We spent decades studying the ones who obeyed.
We barely asked what made the others different.
That question matters more now than it ever has.
The resisters in the COVID era were not difficult to find. Physicians who filed exemptions and lost their licenses. Nurses who walked away from careers rather than mandate patients into decisions they hadn’t genuinely chosen. Scientists who published contrary data knowing what it would cost them. Parents who stood alone at school board meetings. Ordinary people who simply said, quietly, without drama , no.
What made them different?
Research consistently identifies a cluster of factors. Not personality traits you either have or don’t. Situational and cognitive patterns that can be cultivated.
First: prior reflection on authority. The resisters had usually thought, before the crisis, about the limits of institutional trust. They weren’t cynics. They were people who had already asked the question “under what conditions would I refuse?” before anyone was asking them to comply.
Second: a concrete reference point outside the consensus. A value, a principle, an oath, a relationship that existed independently of the institutional structure demanding compliance. Something the system couldn’t reach.
Third: at least one other person. Milgram found that a single dissenting confederate reduced compliance dramatically. The resisters rarely stood entirely alone. They found each other. Sustained each other. Gave each other permission.
Fourth: the willingness to tolerate social pain. Not immunity to it. Tolerance of it. They felt the pressure. They felt the exclusion. They chose the discomfort of integrity over the comfort of belonging.
None of this is innate. All of it is learnable.
The most important thing Milgram, Asch, and Zimbardo taught us is not how fragile conscience is.
It’s that conscience can hold, if you’ve trained it, named its limits, and found even one other person willing to hold theirs beside you.
Build that now. Because the experiment is always running.
Until then stay humble.
🚨NEW: We've just launched a speedy tool for YOU to reject digital ID checks for social media access
The Government's new plans for social media restrictions may require every Briton to submit to intrusive ID checks.
Tell your MP to oppose these plans⤵️
https://t.co/8TBWFeVxNB
STUDY FINDS 96% REMISSION RATE OF ALPHA-GAL SYNDROME WITH AURICULAR ACUPUNCTURE
With nearly 500,000 Americans now affected by tick-induced meat allergy, a peer-reviewed study reports almost unbelievable results using a little-known form of ear acupuncture.
Researchers evaluated 137 patients with alpha-gal syndrome treated with Soliman Auricular Allergy Treatment (SAAT).
Among patients with follow-up data, 96% reported remission of symptoms after treatment.
Many who previously could not tolerate beef, pork, dairy, or other mammalian foods were reportedly able to reintroduce them without allergic reactions.
The procedure is unusual. Patients do not ingest or get injected with alpha-gal.
Instead, they simply touch a vial containing the allergen while clinicians identify a reactive point on the ear using electrical detection.
A tiny acupuncture needle is then placed in a specific auricular zone and left in place for about three weeks.
Even among patients with a prior history of anaphylaxis, 93.1% reported no subsequent symptoms after accidental—or in some cases intentional—exposure following treatment.
No adverse reactions to the acupuncture procedure itself were reported.
This was a retrospective case series, not a randomized controlled trial.
But with AGS cases exploding and no accepted treatment beyond avoidance, a reported 96% remission rate is difficult to ignore.
Raw kidney beans: five of them will hospitalise you with phytohaemagglutinin poisoning.
Raw cassava: kills people regularly in food-insecure regions if the cyanogenic glycosides aren't processed out.
Raw elderberries: contain cyanide compounds. Toxic without cooking.
Raw potatoes: solanine. Enough of them and the nervous system stops cooperating.
Raw grain: mycotoxins, lectins, phytates. Requires milling, soaking, and cooking to be safely edible.
Raw spinach: oxalates that accumulate in soft tissue and kidneys with regular use.
Raw ribeye: safe. Eaten raw across cultures for thousands of years. No processing required.
The plant kingdom is, biochemically, defending itself. The chemistry is real and documented. Every soaking, sprouting, fermenting, boiling, and roasting step humans developed for plants exists because the plant was actively trying to deter the eater.
And the soaking, sprouting, and fermenting only makes the plant *less* toxic. Never fully safe. Never as inert as a piece of meat sitting on a chopping board.
You don't have to cook a steak to avoid hospital. You absolutely have to cook a red kidney bean.
The animal is on your side. The plant has been at war with you the entire time.