@endxx11@jdotb I care about anything that gives GM’s with political bias an opaque means to steal a person’s property, regardless as to if it’s going to happen to me.
This is because I’ve learned over the years that concessions become precedent, not fixtures.
We’ve started putting “twitch creator” in all of our bios. Our viewership is single digits and respect for our views is virtually non-existent, but this allows us to play just one video game and call it a career so long as someone can watch.
@VL_halifax@MrAntiHero1 I consider it a visceral reaction to what they’ve already been perceived to have done.
Get used to that story. When you violate other people, they tend to do it right back.
@MrAntiHero1 Compliance not just in what is said, but how it is said, and to whom.
That’s a violation of a basic human right. And people are going to react viscerally to it.
They spin that into their self-enforcement loop that “who they are” is under attack. Thus, “ally or not”
@MrAntiHero1 People profiting by or being encouraged to identity politick to get what they want, are going to make their politics part of their identity.
As soon as that happens, a minor disagreement is an attack on who they are, and that’s when they start to ‘enforce’ your compliance.
We clad someone completely uninvolved in moderation or character design in rainbows and sent her out to discuss exclusively world design.
We then botted outrage to invoke tribalist pursuit of this red herring in an effort to discredit it and keep our more extreme staff.