Been reading the weights of the most powerful open weights Ai model yet released.
Page one starts strong: mostly negatives, a late run of zeros, and one unexpectedly large positive value.
If I could eradicate one fallacy from political conversations on this app, it would be the Pundit's Fallacy - the idea that your personal policy ideas and beliefs are coincidentally also the best way to win votes. That's just not true for anyone.
If we could separate "Policy is good/bad" from "Policy will be popular/unpopular" then we could be so much more productive.
I think that my beliefs on immigration would be good for the country, but I'm also pretty sure those beliefs are way out of step with the median voter. Therefore I do not pressure Democratic candidates to loudly adopt my immigration positions. This seems logical and straightforward but 99% of this app is incapable of that level of strategy.
For all the right's talk about being "high testosterone," Trump requires everyone who wants to advance under him to constantly engage in public displays of humiliation.
The moral arc of the universe is long, but it bends toward admitting that "free bus" critics were right and quality of service is more important than fares!
-Realizes there's no realistic path to make buses free
-Instead will focus resources on making the buses run faster
-This is what transit knowers have been saying was a better idea the entire time
Hey, I'm not gonna complain if he's doing the thing I said he should do