Lo siento, pero es que lleva razón.
Tienes pareja. Le pides tener sexo. Te dice que no. Y tú sigues insistiendo, insistiendo e insistiendo hasta que acaba cediendo solo para que te calles la puta boca, dejes de manosearla y la dejes en paz. No está teniendo sexo contigo porque quiera tenerlo; lo está haciendo para que pares.
Quizá algunos no lo llamarían violación. Pero que esto forma parte de la cultura de la violación es una realidad como una casa. La chica no está diciendo ninguna barbaridad.
¿Qué es exactamente lo que os sorprende de lo que expone? ¿Que, como es tu pareja, según vosotros ya no puede existir coerción? ¿Que una relación te da algún tipo de derecho sobre el cuerpo de la otra persona?
Porque no. Que sea tu pareja no te da ningún poder sobre ella ni convierte su cuerpo en algo a tu disposición. Y si ya te ha dicho UNA vez que NO, ¿por qué sigues insistiendo?
¿Dónde está la contradicción en sus palabras? Porque yo no la veo.
CEDER POR AGOTAMIENTO O PRESIÓN NO EQUIVALE A UN DESEO LIBRE.
¡SORTEO POR LA PRIMERA VICTORIA DE ESPAÑA 🇪🇸 EN EL MUNDIAL!
1 Camiseta de España a elegir:
🔹 España Clásica
🔹 España Heritage
Para participar:
1️⃣ Sígueme a mi y a @Hispadrops
2️⃣ Dale RT a esta publicación
3️⃣ Comenta cuál de las dos te llevarías
📅 Ganador: 30-06
🚨🚨🚨🚨SORTEO🚨🚨🚨🚨
Camiseta retro del Betis a elegir!
⚠️ PASOS:
1️⃣ Seguir a @17ct_info y @BrioEnfurecida .
2️⃣ Dar RT y LIKE al tweet.
🎁 Ganador al acabar el próximo partido de España
🍀 ¡Mucha suerte!
“You can only cry for your country scoring”
Me when Curaçao, that i couldn’t pin point on a map until like two hours ago, scored their first goal ever:
🚨🗣️New: Thierry Henry reacts to the Brazil, Morocco, and Netherlands press conferences, where questions in Spanish were reportedly not permitted for Hakimi, Vinícius Jr., and Frenkie de Jong:
“I have covered World Cups for years, and this situation makes absolutely no sense to me. You’re telling me a World Cup co-hosted by Mexico can stop journalists from asking questions in Spanish? That’s like hosting a Formula 1 race and banning cars from using their engines.
We saw it with Hakimi. We saw it with Vinícius. Now we’re hearing similar stories involving Frenkie de Jong. The players understood the questions. The journalists spoke one of the most widely spoken languages on the planet. Yet somehow the language became the problem.
Gianni Infantino talks about inclusion, diversity, and bringing football to everyone. Fine. Then explain this contradiction. How can FIFA celebrate diversity in every promotional video and then create headlines because Spanish journalists are being told to switch languages at a tournament hosted by Mexico?
Spanish isn’t some obscure dialect spoken by a handful of people. It’s the language of hundreds of millions across the Americas and beyond. If a journalist from Mexico, Spain, Argentina, Colombia, or anywhere else asks a question in Spanish and the player understands it, why is football creating barriers where none existed?
The irony is unbelievable. FIFA keeps telling us football belongs to everyone, but this controversy has many fans asking whether some voices are more welcome than others.
Maybe there’s a logistical explanation. Maybe it’s a translation issue. But perception matters. And right now the perception is terrible.
Because what fans are seeing is simple: a World Cup hosted partly by a Spanish-speaking nation, players who understand Spanish, journalists who speak Spanish, and officials telling them not to use Spanish.
If that’s progress, somebody needs to explain it better. Because from the outside, it looks like football’s governing body is tripping over its own message.”
“FIFA wanted a celebration of diversity. Instead, they’ve handed the internet a controversy that won’t stop being discussed.”