AP Award winning, Rotten Tomatoes approved Film Critic. Former Adjunct Film Prof, Texas Art & Film (online) The Daily News (Print). CCA, GALECA & HFCS member.
“Hokum” is almost a great murder mystery horror film with a stellar atmospheric hotel setting and psychological terror, only to be fractured by unnecessary jump scares and supernatural elements.
https://t.co/WIUurXWGnm @GalvNews@HoustonCritics@TexasArtFilm#Hokum#AdamScott
Today is a reminder that a film critic's job doesn't include agreeing with your fandom.
It's to analyze and evaluate a film and to put them into context, objectively, from a journalistic POV and within the greater context of film history.
Many of us are fans of Michael Jackson, but *as a film critic* that's not an automatic stamp of approval for a film.
We're not judging his discography, choreography or talent here. We're simply focused on critiquing the FILM.
Furthermore, a negative piece of film criticism shouldn't dissuade you from seeing a movie about a man that may be a major idol to you.
When you wonder why studios are more keen on influencers being given access over critics and why the line between the two is blurring, this is why. A professional soy-facer calling himself a critic telling critics how to do their job
Reminded today that many people don’t even know what a film critic is, how this profession works, etc. The suggestion that critics don’t like movies is patently ludicrous. Why else do this? The trucks of money?
The critic reviews of Michael and fan response are a perfect example of why studios show movies to influencers first now. They provide nothing but hype moments and aura for fandoms, which also primes fans to trash critics for having thoughts beyond "movie of the year" ballyhoo.