CROSSFIRE COMICS INC

New, Creative, Fun, Action/Sci-Fi/Hero Comics a Go-Go.

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@GregCapullo Fuck yeah!

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@liilybrownn @grok What's your stuffy's name?

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

Had to do a quick @captainamerica on a break from insane panel work! Sometimes you just wanna draw Superheroes!

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@elonmusk @grok Osiris

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@hosun_chung They are the CIA, and have been for over a decade.

[Kyle Kemper 💫 @kylekemper]

🎯 🇨🇦 💪 🚚🛡️https://t.co/4kS3N5CX0d

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@ElofsonJess Here's the FULL interview:

https://t.co/c3bMv78q8R

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@olddog100ua ??

[BCBarracuda @BCCuda]

This must be seen by EVERYONE! CARNEY is a full on DICTATOR! In the future, if you want children, you will need to apply! Seriously insane!!!! Share!!!!

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@Martyupnorth_2 Who's the guy to the right of Jagmeet (Mr. Khalistan)?

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

2/2...For Germany, the deal boosted exports—crucial during the Depression—and undermined the anti-Nazi boycott. Between 1933 and 1937 alone, 77.8 million Reichsmarks in goods flowed to Palestine, rising to 105 million by 1939. It also served Nazi propaganda: an “international agreement” with Jews signaled legitimacy to the world, even as domestic oppression worsened.
Controversy and Moral Quandary
The Haavara Agreement was a lightning rod from the start. Revisionist Zionists, led by Ze’ev Jabotinsky, decried it as a betrayal of the boycott, arguing it propped up Hitler’s regime. Non-Zionist Jews, especially in the U.S. and Britain, saw it as morally untenable—trading with Nazis while Jews suffered. Within Germany, some Nazis opposed it, preferring outright theft of Jewish wealth, though pragmatists like Hjalmar Schacht, Reichsbank president, backed it for economic reasons.
Zionist leaders faced an agonizing dilemma: save lives now or hold the moral line against a regime they despised? Supporters argued it was the only viable escape route before the Holocaust’s full horror unfolded. Critics countered that it normalized Nazi power and diverted focus from broader rescue efforts. The debate persists—did it save 60,000, or delay a unified resistance that might have saved more?
Evolution and End
Hitler’s stance on Haavara wavered. Early on, he was indifferent, focused more on consolidating power than economic minutiae. By 1937-1939, he supported it as expulsion aligned with his escalating “Jewish problem” rhetoric. But as war loomed, alternatives like the Madagascar Plan surfaced, and after the 1939 invasion of Poland, Haavara collapsed amid global conflict and shifting Nazi priorities toward extermination.
Broader Implications
The agreement’s legacy is thorny. It’s not evidence of a Zionist-Nazi “alliance”—a misreading pushed by some revisionists—but a desperate compromise in a darkening world. It highlights how Nazi policy evolved from expulsion to genocide, and how Zionist pragmatism clashed with Jewish diaspora ideals. It also prefigures later tensions: the economic seeds it planted in Palestine fed into Israel’s 1948 founding, yet its ethical shadow lingers in debates over collaboration versus survival.

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

The Haavara Agreement, signed on August 25, 1933, was a pragmatic yet polarizing deal between Nazi Germany and Zionist organizations, specifically the Zionist Federation of Germany and the Anglo-Palestine Bank (acting under the Jewish Agency’s direction). It emerged just months after Hitler’s ascent to power in January 1933, during a period when Nazi anti-Jewish policies were intensifying but had not yet crystallized into the full-scale genocide of the Holocaust. The agreement’s core purpose was to enable German Jews to emigrate to Palestine—then under British mandate—while salvaging a portion of their assets, which Nazi laws otherwise barred them from taking abroad.
Origins and Context
To understand why this agreement came about, picture Germany in 1933: the Nazis had just seized control, and their anti-Semitic agenda was ramping up. The April 1, 1933, boycott of Jewish businesses marked an early public escalation, while laws stripping Jews of rights were in the pipeline. Meanwhile, a global Jewish-led boycott of German goods was gaining traction, threatening Germany’s fragile, depression-ravaged economy. For the Nazis, expelling Jews aligned with their goal of making Germany Judenrein (free of Jews), but they also needed to mitigate economic backlash.
On the Zionist side, the movement aimed to build a Jewish homeland in Palestine. Leaders like Chaim Weizmann and David Ben-Gurion saw an influx of German Jews—many of whom were educated and wealthy—as a chance to bolster the Yishuv (Jewish community in Palestine). The problem? British immigration quotas under the Mandate were tight, and Nazi currency controls locked Jewish wealth inside Germany. The Haavara Agreement was a workaround: it turned Jewish assets into German exports, benefiting both Nazi economic interests and Zionist settlement goals.
Negotiations began in spring 1933, with key figures like Sam Cohen of Hanotea��a Zionist citrus company—laying the groundwork. Cohen’s initial deal with the Reich Economics Ministry allowed blocked Jewish accounts to fund German goods for Palestine, a pilot that scaled up into the formal agreement by August. The Zionist Federation and the Jewish Agency, despite internal divisions, saw it as a lifeline; the Nazis, including figures like Adolf Eichmann, viewed it as a propaganda win and a way to dodge the boycott.
How It Worked: The Mechanics
The process was intricate. A German Jew wanting to emigrate would deposit their money into a blocked account managed by a trust company, Haavara Ltd., set up in Tel Aviv. That money bought German goods—think machinery, textiles, or agricultural equipment—which were shipped to Palestine. There, Jewish businesses or importers sold the goods, and the proceeds (minus hefty fees and taxes) went to the emigrant in Palestinian pounds. Typically, an individual recovered about 43% of their original funds, with another 39% funneled into communal Zionist projects like farms or infrastructure.
For example, a Jewish family with 10,000 Reichsmarks might see 4,300 RM worth of goods reach Palestine, netting them roughly 1,800 Palestinian pounds after sales—a significant loss, but better than the near-total confiscation faced by those leaving without the agreement. Between 1933 and 1939, this system transferred around 139 million Reichsmarks (about $100 million today), aiding some 60,000 German Jews—over 10% of Germany’s 1933 Jewish population—to relocate.
Impacts and Outcomes
For the emigrants, it was a mixed bag. They escaped rising persecution—like the Nuremberg Laws of 1935—and started anew in Palestine, often as “capitalist” immigrants under British rules requiring £1,000 (about $5,000 then). The influx fueled economic growth in the Yishuv, funding kibbutzim, factories, and urban expansion in places like Tel Aviv. By 1939, German Jews made up a notable chunk of Palestine’s Jewish population, bringing skills and capital that shaped the future state of Israel. 1/2...

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

The Haavara Agreement was a pact signed on August 25, 1933, between the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank (under the directive of the Jewish Agency), and the government of Nazi Germany. The name "Haavara" comes from the Hebrew word for "transfer," reflecting its purpose: to facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine while allowing them to transfer a portion of their assets. This agreement was controversial and remains a subject of debate due to its implications and the context of Nazi policies.
Under the agreement, Jews emigrating from Germany to Palestine could deposit money into a special account in Germany. These funds were used to purchase German goods, which were then exported to Palestine and sold. After sale, the proceeds (minus fees and taxes) were given to the emigrants in Palestinian currency. This mechanism allowed Nazi Germany to boost its exports during an economic boycott by Jewish organizations worldwide, while also enabling some Jews to escape persecution with part of their wealth intact. Between 1933 and 1939, around 60,000 German Jews emigrated to Palestine through this arrangement, transferring roughly 139 million Reichsmarks (equivalent to about $100 million in today’s terms, adjusted for inflation).
The agreement arose in a dire context: after Hitler’s rise to power in 1933, Nazi policies increasingly targeted Jews, stripping them of rights and property. Zionist leaders saw it as a pragmatic way to save lives and build a Jewish homeland, while Nazi officials viewed it as a means to expel Jews and circumvent the boycott. Critics, including many Jews globally, condemned it for breaking the boycott and indirectly legitimizing trade with the Nazi regime. Within Germany, the agreement faced opposition from hardline Nazis who preferred total confiscation of Jewish assets, but it was supported by figures like Adolf Eichmann, who saw it as aligning with the goal of removing Jews from Germany.
By 1939, the agreement ended as World War II began, and Nazi policy shifted toward the Holocaust. Its legacy is complex: it saved lives and property for some, but it also highlighted the moral dilemmas of negotiating with a regime bent on genocide.

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@j00ny369T Rorschach

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

Yes, the story from 2014 about scientists discovering an "impenetrable barrier" approximately 11,500 km (about 7,200 miles) above Earth's surface is based on real scientific findings, though the term "impenetrable barrier" is a bit of a dramatic simplification. Here's what happened:
In 2014, a team led by Professor Daniel Baker at the University of Colorado, Boulder, published research based on data from NASA’s Van Allen Probes. These probes, launched in 2012, were designed to study the Van Allen radiation belts—two doughnut-shaped regions of charged particles trapped by Earth’s magnetic field. The team discovered a sharp boundary within these belts, located roughly 11,500 km above Earth’s surface, that acts as a shield against high-energy electrons, often called "killer electrons" due to their ability to damage satellites and pose risks to astronauts.
This boundary isn’t a physical wall but rather a dynamic feature caused by interactions between Earth’s magnetic field and low-frequency plasma waves, specifically a type called "plasmaspheric hiss." These waves scatter the ultra-relativistic electrons (those moving near the speed of light), preventing them from penetrating closer to Earth. The discovery was significant because it explained why these dangerous particles are confined to the outer radiation belt and don’t easily reach lower altitudes, offering natural protection to satellites in geosynchronous orbit and below.
The research was published in the journal Nature on November 26, 2014, under the title "An impenetrable barrier to ultrarelativistic electrons in the Van Allen radiation belts." The catchy phrase "impenetrable barrier" caught the attention of science news outlets, leading to headlines that might suggest something more solid or mysterious than the actual phenomenon—a plasma-based interaction. So, while the discovery is true and fascinating, it’s not an impenetrable wall in the literal sense but a remarkable feature of Earth’s space environment.
If you’re curious about more details, I can dig deeper into how the Van Allen Probes detected this or what it means for space weather!

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@RichardAngwin @elonmusk Democracy!! You speak about Democracy yet the UN backs a leader who has canceled ALL elections and put his political opposition in prison. And you speak of DEMOCRACY???? Give me a break.

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@saucyseawitch @PierrePoilievre I also have to stop talking to people who are reading geo politics at a 2nd grade level. Byyyyeeeee!

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@saucyseawitch @TrueEager @PierrePoilievre Cause I spend no time on this shit unlike you amazing people. Canada is fakkkd

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

Proud to be the 137th 😎 on @BackerKit for Nightmare Machine 7- Resurrection (RATED R) + Hardcover Book. Thanks @baddonutcomics https://t.co/FaZ5XM884a

[CROSSFIRE COMICS INC @CROSSFIRECOMICS]

@CheriDiNovo Those Nazi flags were proven to be placed by a PR Firm hired by the Liberal Party. They also are connected to the Liberal Party at every event they show up.......hmmmm......