We’ve finished third-party testing on some of our current batches at Crush Research. Every batch below passed full multi-vial testing, plus solubility testing and vial cap/stopper integrity testing:
✅ Triple Agonist: 10mg / 20mg / 30mg/ 50mg
✅ Double Agonist: 10mg / 20mg /30mg/ 40mg / 60mg
✅ GHK-Cu: 50mg / 100mg
✅ Tesamorelin: 10mg
And we’re not done. Next week we’re sending 10 more SKUs out for the same testing.
We’ve also got new SKUs coming tonight 🔥
KPV 30mg
Cerebrolysin 60mg
Elora 10mg
BPC-157 10mg / TB-500 10mg / KPV 10mg Blend
CJC-1295 (No DAC) 10mg
Triple Agonist 20mg / Elora 5mg Blend
We’ll keep posting results as they come in.
We messed up.
When @rorynotsorry was reviewing our COAs before he sent out an email to our customers, he noticed that when we sent out our existing batches for retesting, we accidently assigned the products a new batch number (ending with a -1109 postfix)
This is not how it should have worked. We should have had the products tested under the same batch number, since they were all manufactured as one batch.
We want to be fully transparent with what we are going to do going forward. We are going to use the new batch number going forward because it has the most recent and comprehensive testing, however we are going to link the COAs from the old batch and the new batch in our testing database with an explanation, so that people can see both sets of testing, and can easily view either COA no matter which batch number is printed on the vial.
We also want to announce that going forward in the future we are going to add a second laboratory mass spec testing when we get new batches to independently confirm the testing results from our primary laboratory. It may take a while to get full implemented, but we hope to send out the first of the second lab samples next week.
Finally, we want to thank Rory for spotting something that we didn’t notice. His attention to detail in these things are why he was able to change the industry, and why we continue to lean on him for advice.
We appreciate this community for holding us to a high standard. You’re the reason we put this much attention into testing.
@LadyCurmudgeon We do not sell batches before testing is completed, this is a retest of an already tested batch to include vial integrity testing and solubility testing. Thank you !
A note from the new owners of Crush 🧪
We've seen the post going around about the rubber stoppers on our vials, and we want to address it directly.
The rubber stopper under the cap comes in two finishes: smooth and textured. The textured version can look noticeably rougher in a close-up photo. We pulled samples of both styles, and both performed as expected in our functional checks. We want to emphasize, and make completely clear, there is nothing functionally wrong with these stoppers. We understand however the aesthetic concern with these and going forward will only be using the smooth stoppers.
That said, if anything about your vial looks off, we want to hear about it. If your stopper looks torn, punctured, or loose, or you notice a damaged metal seal or any leakage, please set the vial aside and contact us before opening or handling it further.
When you reach out, include:
* Your order number
* The batch number on the label
* A clear photo of the vial as you received it
We'll review every report and follow up with next steps.
We're also adding solubility and closure testing to every SKU we test with ILS, starting with 11 SKUs this week.
If you'd like to know anything about us or our plans for crush, let us know in the replies!
Thanks for keeping us accountable. That's exactly how it should be.
— The New Crush Owners