@HaFrenchie@DanielHassanFL Sorry to tell you Daniel but social media isn't real life. And Florida is not currently blue. Jolly still has less real life odds to win then you believe.
@eldissian You have retail for that. The big reason everybody wanted Classic Plus was because we didn't want the modern retail crap that's out there stop trying to turn everything into modern retail wow that's not going to work
@JohnCornyn You or your intern that runs your social media account is really crashing out since the Texas voters realized how awful you were and resoundingly voted your butt out.
You don't flirt with people your not trying to get with unless you are looking for validation, a confidence boost, or cheating. It's not wrong to stop cheating when they are married in fact that is the proper move. You are weird for implying he was a bad friend for stopping flirting with a married person
@miichiwi Congratulations on your first MMO release LOL this is like the most commonly repeated complaint ever on any MMOs release whether it's beta or full release ever
Ken unfortunately amendment 3 is a refund the police amendment. It's impossible to cut that much money in a single year followed by another massive cut the second year without. It will cut hiring, equipment and training. I vote Republican 99 percent of time but this amendment was rushed and is poorly thought out. There is a reason why every police and fire department is coming out about it being bad. And it's not because "government bad" it's a bad amendment.
You cannot tell cities to cut millions of dollars without affecting hiring, equipment, training, and response time. I fully understand cities waste money and are bloated. But an amendment is taking a sledggehamer and offers zero real maneuverability when the leaks in public safety funding pop up. It's why every police and fire dept is calling it out.
It's definitely not about wanting the taxes and the cities and states which do waste our money to be more fiscally conservative. it's that this was a very rushed amendment that's going to cause more harm than good period and I understand the passion of all the people on social media. Those thatl always put in large exclamation marks- vote. Yes, over and over again in the comments. But this bill, this amendment is a very poorly worded amendment. That's going to have drastic negative affects on the services that do matter
No, it's because they rushed out a poorly written bill that they're trying to change as an amendment. That's going to decimate the funding. For most public safety period you can have two things be true at the same time. Cities are awful and wasteful, and this is a horribly written amendment. That's going to decimate public safety
@shadowarlok I watched the first half of inept villainess thinking it was going to be low effort. Watched the entire thing and so far it's been excellent.
@TheAppleDesign I think both companies are failing hard in battery size. The tech exists for better now. They just don't prioritize it like we the users do.
@FireDad182 What it is is an extremely selfish act on their part they're basically saying they don't care about your wife's feelings or memories or what she wants it's only about them their feelings and what they want. An extremely selfish mentality that they have
Log in
You said:
View in the Grok app
Open Grok
I was talking to a person that doesn't think Lindsay Clancy strangled her three children she said there's no evidence can you list out what evidence there is that Lindsey Clancy killed her kids completely leave out anything that has to do with whether or not she was criminally responsible or mentally ill that wasn't the discussion that I was having with the person they think there's zero evidence that she actually strangled her kids can you list what evidence exists that show she strangled her kids avoid the politics of white talking about the trial itself just post to me the evidence that she strangled her kids
Continue your conversation
ChatGPT said:
Yes. If you set aside criminal responsibility, postpartum psychosis, motive, politics, and the question of whether she should be found guilty, there is substantial evidence concerning the physical act of strangling the children.
The evidence publicly reported includes:
The children's autopsies: The three children were determined to have died from ligature strangulation. At trial, Clancy stipulated to the factual findings of the autopsies.
C
CT Insider
Ligatures/exercise bands: Investigators said all three children had exercise bands/ropes around their necks. Prosecutors identified exercise bands as the ligatures used in the killings.
B
Boston 25 News
+1
Physical strangulation injuries: A paramedic who treated 8-month-old Callan testified that he had deep strangulation marks extending around the entire circumference of his neck.
N
New York Post
The condition of the children when their father returned: Patrick Clancy found all three children unresponsive in the home and called 911. First responders subsequently treated the children and documented the circumstances. The 911 call was played for jurors during the trial.
P
PBS
+1
Clancy's own admission: This is probably the most straightforward answer to the person's claim that there is "zero evidence." Clancy has admitted that she killed/strangled the children. Her defense has not disputed that she physically killed them; the defense has instead argued about her mental state and criminal responsibility.
W
WBUR
+1
The physical evidence was consistent with the alleged method: The combination of the ligatures found around the children's necks, the documented strangulation injuries, and the autopsy findings is physical evidence that the children were strangled.
N
New York Post
+1
Contemporaneous police investigation: The original police affidavit sought charges for murder and strangulation and identified Clancy as the person of interest in the deaths at the Duxbury home.