5 Quant explainers. 1 map. ๐บ๏ธ
Overledger, Fusion, PayScript, Quant Flow, SATP: I covered each one alone. This video puts them together, layer by layer, plus the 3 places $QNT shows up.
10 min, straight from the docs ๐งต๐
Which layer do you know least about?
@IOV_OWL ISDA's ask is common standards for tokenized collateral without adding fragmentation. Collateral moves between bank ledgers, not one chain. Murex MX.3 repo with rollback via Overledger is that workflow. Standards plus orchestration across systems is Quant's lane. $QNT
@DreadBong0@elshredo@gverdian Dentsu Soken is already a public Quant partner for Japan's tokenised deposits, so Gilbert's "Programmable Yen next?" has a real base under it. What I'd watch for is a named Japanese bank or network, not another partner. Substance first, announcement second.
@elliotrades Stablecoins aren't the end state. Banks won't let deposits leave, so institutions use tokenized deposits on separate ledgers. Bottleneck becomes interoperability. That's the $QNT bet: Overledger + QuantNet, building UK tokenised sterling deposits with banks.
@DutchAlchemist: split it into three questions. Does the software need the token? Does usage force demand? Does Quant's success reach holders? Overledger and Fusion answer differently, and Fusion gas is QNT per Quant's docs. @quantnetwork
People keep saying $QNT isn't needed because banks can just pay Quant in dollars.
Most arguments mix up three questions.
Does the software need the token to run?
Does using the product create demand you can't avoid?
Does Quant's commercial success reach holders?
Oracle networks answer how a chain learns a fact. Quant's gateway design answers how independent bank ledgers transact with no one in the middle: each bank signs for its own ledger and stays private. SATP is the IETF draft behind it. GBTD live, TCH selected. $qnt
$QNT gets lumped in with every other interoperability token.
I think that's a mistake, and the reason goes back to how the internet itself was designed.
Quant has been designed to be "Internet-Scale".
But what does that mean?