Introducing https://t.co/KIlwCrB9Qt
The first ZK-powered casino & sportsbook with non-custodial, no-KYC access to Tier-1 providers and games.
Built for provable, trustless play.
Join the Early Rollers Race to share $30,000 → https://t.co/0aiVJsDhRs
xNode GIVEAWAY — $100 top-up
Build your node basket with $100!
Which nodes will you choose and why?
To enter:
→ Register at xNode: https://t.co/Lhz6IMNVr4
→ Quote this tweet with your picks and reasons
Win a $100 top-up. Choose wisely!
Results on Monday
The CIS community has already faced this.
I was personally affected last year when MEXC simply delete $3,000 from my account balance and blocked it.
be safe guys.
I might be wrong
But I think most people misunderstand how growth actually works on X.
On YouTube, there’s a very clear rule:
if your own subscribers don’t watch, like, or stay on your content, the algorithm has zero reason to push it to anyone else.
Why would it?
If your most loyal audience ignores you, then what's the point of recommending your content to others and pushing it into trending categories.
Now here’s my theory
X works the same way.
> Maybe not officially.
> Maybe not documented.
> But behaviorally - it makes too much sense.
If people who chose to follow you:
• don’t read
• don’t like
•don’t interact
why would the algo test your post on strangers?
So I did something unpopular:
I unfollowed 1000+ dead accounts.
Manually.
I’d rather have:
500 real eyes
than 5,000 zombies training the algo to ignore me.
If your core audience is dead, you’re teaching the system that your content doesn’t matter.