I think the part before a transaction gets signed deserves more attention
because clicking confirm is usually the easiest part
the harder part is knowing what you’re about to approve.
Which asset is moving?
Where is it going?
What route is being used?
What will the transaction change?
And what happens after it goes through?
That’s where @ask_oro’s pre-transaction checks become useful.
ORO can analyze the request, simulate the transaction and surface what is expected to happen before you sign.
so instead of:
request → wallet → confirm → hope everything works
the experience can be closer to:
request → inspect → simulate → approve.
and I think that distinction matters.
Onchain transactions are permanent, so understanding the transaction before signing is just as important as getting it executed.
The wallet should still be the final point of approval.
But having more information before that approval can make the process much easier to evaluate.
That’s the part of ORO I think is worth exploring further:
not just helping users do things onchain, but giving them a better view of what they’re about to sign.
Would you want this kind of pre-transaction analysis for every onchain action?
https://t.co/JcMDfZAGfX