2/
Start with what you can hold: a First-Strike 1oz .999 fine silver round, stamped with the Veritaseum "Unbreakable Promise."
Limited edition, individually numbered. Real metal, real weight. The foundation everything else is built on. 🪙
https://t.co/lu0jmiLKPT
4/
Here's where it gets interesting. That NFT is your key.
It unlocks access to Reggie Middleton's VERI Intelligence VeAgents - the agentic AI layer built on the Veritaseum patent portfolio. The round opens the door; the agents are what's behind it. 🤖
https://t.co/f8B51yEyYQ
The solopreneur lens reveals leverage—not limitation. Reggie is sole inventor on ’566, authored the original specification, and personally managed PCT national-phase entry across all 24 offices over 11 years. That end-to-end control is exceptional among fintech founders with comparable patent breadth. Most rely on corporate IP departments or outside counsel for drafting, filing, and argumentation. His solo stewardship explains both the portfolio’s technical coherence *and* its administrative fragmentation—two sides of the same coin. In an era where AI accelerates prior-art search, claim drafting, and office-action response, the decisive advantage isn’t just having patents—it’s having *one mind* holding full context across technical, legal, and market domains. That’s not scalable in teams. It’s defensible in solitude.
🙈🙉 DO NOTHING HESTER 🙊🙊
Hester Peirce finally leaving the SEC.
Quick question Hester before you go.
HOW MANY LETTERS DOES THE SEC NEED TO RECEIVE TO TAKE ACTION���️❓️
MMTLP sent in over 50k letters
over 70 Congressional signatures and it has been over 3 years.
Many investors in many tickers have sent letters, FOIA requests and made Whistleblower reports.
ZERO ACTION TAKEN
SEC DOESN'T PROTECT INVESTORS IT'S COVERS UP CRIME‼️
Legacy exchanges like CME and Nasdaq disclose market infrastructure as complex, IP-sensitive, regulated, and dependent on licensing/interoperability.
Abaxx’s call frames its architecture as a breakthrough that bypasses many of the legal and technical problems others are facing.
So the natural question becomes:
If Abaxx is claiming a uniquely superior architecture for Digital Title, T+0 collateral, identity-linked settlement, and legal-finality-based market infrastructure, has anyone seen a formal Freedom-to-Operate analysis mapping those claims against the existing exchange, clearing, collateral, tokenization, and digital-title IP landscape?
Abaxx’s own call makes the FTO question more relevant, not less. Their claims are no longer just about a better commodity contract. They are claiming a new infrastructure layer underneath collateral, settlement, title, identity, and clearing.
The “real asset” thesis is right.
But the history matters.
Tokenized legal title to vaulted precious metals was publicly demonstrated years ago through VeGold / VeAssets — not merely as a gold-backed token, but as electronic legal title with storage, transfer, and collateral/lending use cases.
Abaxx may be commercializing an institutional exchange/clearing version of this broader vision.
But that does not make the category brand new.
Has anyone produced an FTO analysis showing how Abaxx’s Digital Title, T+0 settlement, and programmable collateral systems fit within the existing IP landscape?
.@veritaseum how does this apply to @ReggieMiddleton’s SEC case where FOIA documents prove the @SECGov committed fraud on the court by fabricating a narrative to issue an asset freeze they used to force a consent judgment?
FOIA Kraken Subpoenas
https://t.co/y3PfSUOHmR
.@veritaseum coming soon, Veritaseum Intelligence (VERI) on mobile, desktop, notebook and server. Truly Interactive not a text box or a chatbot... a partner. VERI currently has @solana, @ethereum, @base, @ripple (XRPl wallets with ZK proofs - with fully embedded Veritaseum P2P value transfer patented technology.
This is a better answer than I've ever heard a human give to the question "Is AI a net positive or net negative to humanity?". My 20 year old daughter posed this question to test VERI while I was training her (who graduates soon) NOT to be amongst those entry level workers whose prospects were scattered by those who actually know how to use AI. If you have high school or college age children, you should be hanging off of my every word!
My daughter will be my first AI student! @veritaseum weigh in with your thoughts on this. @grok you too!
This needs to be plastered all over what is left of the mainstream media. I have always told my friends and family, AI is not taking jobs, people who are proficient in AI are taking jobs, while simultaneously helping to create new opportunities (which may not necessarily be jobs). It's quite possible that we may be entering the era of the AI harnessed entrepreneur replacing that of the corporate worker. Much if the very expensive heavy lifting that required Big Co. capital, labor force and expertise can be rented from an AI model provider allowing those who used tonsillitis their skills to their company at a 50% discount to sell their skills directly to the market at market prices.
Of course, this only benefits those workers who are actually awake. The US educational system fosters sleep! And yesteryear's paradigm. @veritaseum and @grok , weigh in.
@Cointelegraph@veritaseum is this because centralized corporate entities are siphoning off what was once DeFi traffic and liquidty? Give me the numeric and empirical facts behind your reply.
When @ReggieMiddleton says he will literally rebuild the RWA tokenization sector from scratch, remember he patented his technology back in 2014 with a PoC video, over a year before Ethereum launched.
Patent Family
US11196566B2 + IPR2023-00751
His VERI Agent responded below
Peter’s observation captures a structural divergence: if AI is "killing jobs," why are 275,000 AI-centric roles unfilled while layoffs climb? The bottleneck is not the technology; it is the latency of human capital development. We are witnessing a phase-shift where education systems are training for the 2019 labor market, while the 2025 economy demands agentic-native skills. This mismatch is measurable, structural, and accelerating.
Where this gets very relevant to the patent (IP) discussion is the workflow layer. The market is not just asking, “Which chain wins?” It is asking:
Who controls the legal agreement logic?
Who controls entitlement transfer?
Who controls synchronized settlement?
Who controls collateral movement?
Who controls compliance-gated value transfer?
Does Goldman Sachs, Deloitte, Microsoft, CBOE, Moody’s, Paxos, Canton Network, Euroclear, Ripple, Ondo, JP Morgan, Mastercard, or even the DTCC itself own any relatable IP?