币圈格言家

Get busying die or get busying living!

[George @thumbsupguy420]

yea SIMD-547 8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump

[Hakuna Matata @Hakunanomics]

8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump

[Hakuna Matata @Hakunanomics]

The biggest narratives usually look niche at first.

Then the right people start paying attention.

Builders discussing it.
Major Solana voices posting about it.
Devs debating incentives.
CT creating lore.

What starts as a proposal becomes a meme.
What starts as a meme becomes culture.

$SIMD-547 feels less like random speculation and more like a Solana-native narrative unfolding in real time.

Some people redesign the farm.

8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump

[mert @mert]

we just revived the simd to reduce solana inflation

worry not manlets, it will happen this time

all gas no brakes

[Carlos @0xcarlosg]

The more I think about SIMD 547, the more I think people are underestimating its potential impact.

A useful way to understand the proposal is through Solana REV. Real Economic Value (REV) measures the value paid for transaction execution, capturing user demand to transact onchain. On Solana, REV includes in-protocol fees such as base fees and priority fees, as well as out-of-protocol Jito tips.

REV is down more than 90% from its peak. In one sense, that is negative for validator and tokenholder economics. But for an L1, the goal should not be to maximize fees at all costs. Solana’s core value proposition is that it remains cheap enough for users and applications to thrive. The challenge is improving SOL value accrual without undermining the low-cost environment that made Solana attractive in the first place.

This is why SIMD 547 is so clever. Rather than broadly raising Solana’s flat base fee, it introduces a resource-based burn that charges transactions based on the resources they request. The mechanism could monetize higher-resource, more price insensitive users while keeping low-resource, high-frequency activity, such as market maker oracle updates, relatively cheap.

The important distinction is that SIMD 547 would accrue directly to SOL tokenholders through the burn mechanism. Priority fees currently flow to validators and only reach stakers through validator-specific arrangements, while applications and transaction landing services increasingly capture much of the value around transaction execution. As shown in the chart below, application revenue has outpaced Solana REV since late 2023, with the app revenue / REV ratio approaching 5x in recent quarters. SIMD 547 would help capture back some of that leaked value by redirecting a portion of users’ willingness to pay for execution into SOL burn.

Based on our scenario analysis and assuming a SOL price of $75, SIMD 547 could generate roughly $71M to $591M of annualized burn-based REV. The lower end assumes 60M CU blocks, 400ms slots, 80% utilization, and a conservative 0.1 lamport parameter, while the upper end assumes 100M CU blocks, 200ms slots, 80% utilization, and a 0.25 lamport parameter.

To put the magnitude in context, Solana generated roughly $18M of REV in May, or ~$216M annualized. This means the proposed resource-based burn could represent ~33% of current annualized REV in the conservative scenario and more than 2.7x current annualized REV in the higher-capacity scenario. Unlike priority fees, application revenue, or transaction landing revenue, this value would accrue to SOL tokenholders directly through burn, removing those tokens from circulation.

[OKX中文 @okxchinese]

https://t.co/hd1Q3ObqMr

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

一同畅玩世界杯之夏，预测赢取 16.66 BTC 奖励。点击注册：https://t.co/vwXK7gimpu

[Hakuna Matata @Hakunanomics]

$SIMD-547 is bullish for a simple reason:

If Solana grows, the tokenomics improve with it.

More activity → more fees burned → tighter supply dynamics.

The proposal turns network usage into a stronger long-term value accrual mechanism for $SOL.

$SIMD-547

8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump

@toly @cavemanloverboy @mert @0xcarlosg @vibhu

[Hakuna Matata @Hakunanomics]

👀👀👀👀👀

HUUUUUUUGE NARRATIVE!!!

$SIMD-547

8S4Qb9YtHr4jHG4ipodnHBpSwa59bx1aWztJm6FLpump

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@satireorcry1 天启皇帝朱由校，木匠皇帝

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

“所谓心智模式，指的是隐藏在每个人内心深处、影响人们如何看待这个世界以及如何做出反应的一些根深蒂固的假设、成见、逻辑、规则，甚至图像、印象等。心智模式是隐而不见的，但它却无时无刻不在制约着人们的思维。”

Excerpt From
系统思考实践篇 (湛庐文化•财富汇)
邱昭良 [邱昭良]
This material may be protected by copyright.

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@0xZhangCrypto1 这个币就像澳门的赌场负责发牌+收手续费，庄家和闲家对赌了很长时间最后发现：他奶奶的，最后钱都流到了手续费那里去了。

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

https://t.co/92pUPb7Sf7
美国军队炸伊朗南部的油轮和军事设施，伊朗没能力打不到美国军舰和设施，好吧我炸它的盟友巴林和科威特的设施，今天科威特的机场就受到无人机轰炸，一名印度人死亡几十人受伤。

围魏救赵，目前伊朗用的方法。
美国：损失的不是我自己就行；
伊朗：反正领导不死就行，下面的人和设备怎么搞都好无所谓；
中东周围国家：妈的，你们在打仗，我们挨最惨的结果。

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@didengshengwu 和尚：盛世开门迎香油，乱世关门躲祸事；
道士：盛世关门修身养性，乱世下山救人救国。

这就是区别！

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@lugeweb3 他这种从0.07 拉到21u 我想问这样的拉盘资金需要多少钱才能做到？当然资费也赚了不少补进去。

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@FLS_OTC 我怕他来一句：关我屌事

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@0xzhaozhao @AirdropAlchemis 有钱就行，丑不是必要条件。是否有钱才是必要条件

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@Wangduanniao @bcgame 鸟哥到时候不要整得钱没赚到目标要求，人傻了。

[币圈格言家 @cryptosangou]

@Appraiser008 那么简单，直接减了就行了