This is also why naive "AI governance" is a bad idea.
If you use an AI to allocate funding for contributions, people WILL put a jailbreak plus "gimme all the money" in as many places as they can.
As an alternative, I support the info finance approach ( https://t.co/pRlYYMNyza ), where you have an open market where anyone can contribute their models, which are subject to a spot-check mechanism that can be triggered by anyone and evaluated by a human jury.
This type of "institution design" approach, where you create an open opportunity for people with LLMs from the outside to plug in, rather than hardcoding a single LLM yourself, is inherently more robust, both because it gives you model diversity in real time and because it creates built-in incentives for both model submitters and external speculators to watch for these issues and quickly correct for them.
CC @devanshmehta
5/5 AI governance will face the same risks if we donโt design institutions with checks, balances, and incentives at the core.
๐ Question for you: Do you believe AI should ever be given ๐ฅ๐ช๐ณ๐ฆ๐ค๐ต decision-making power in governance, or must humans always remain in the loop?
with a ๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐คย of ๐.๐๐!
- on ๐๐๐ง๐๐ ๐ฎ ๐๐ฉ ๐ฐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐พ, @realDonaldTrump ๐๐ฃ๐ฃ๐ค๐ช๐ฃ๐๐๐จ the creation of a #USA#StrategicBitcoinReserve , and #BTC surges from 84.6K to 96.5K, gaining +๐ญ๐ฐ% in a single day .
Unbelievable luck and insane profit! ๐
15/16
Final Thoughts
๐จ This hack is a massive wake-up call for the crypto industry.
๐จ Many in the community are supporting Bybit, acknowledging that no system is 100% secure.
๐จ Stay vigilant, practice digital security, and always verify before signing transactions.