Crystal Keara

🇺🇸 Constitution & Common Sense

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@FmrRepMTG Absolutely 💯 agree

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@xalertnow Terrifying. These poor people and their families

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@Benarasiyaa So scary! Be safe ❤️

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@RealCandaceO Omg this is great!

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@joeroganhq Candace

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@Mother74957710 @scrowder If you read things yourself then you won’t be mislead

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@Mother74957710 @scrowder Clearly whomever wrote this article didn’t read the entire filing or is intentionally misleading the public. Read it yourself

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@Mother74957710 @scrowder Read the filing YOURSELF!

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

No - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

He actually made her point repeatedly. It just went over his head

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

They weren’t even debating the same issue - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

He was actually making her point but it was going over his head

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@ElintMajor @scrowder That wasn’t said. Read the filing in the entirety. Start with the conclusion then go back

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

I dont understand how people are missing Candaces argument - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

Andrew’s repeated questions are actually proving her point. It’s just going completely over his head.

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

He’s actually proving her point. I think it’s going over his head

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

They don’t seem to understand - The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.

Candace and Andrew weren’t even debating on the same level or issue. If anything he was actually proving her point. It was going completely over his head

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@scrowder Honestly I can’t say who won because I don’t think they were debating the same issues. Andrew was missing the deeper point. If anything he was making Candace’s point. If I had to pick it would have to be Candace, but they weren’t debating on the same level or issue

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

Candace and others are just pointing out that others also have motive. Some may find those motives absurd just like some find the “furry” motive absurd. All we have is what we heard and seen over the years. Theres definitely a lot of strange behavior coming from people that are supposed to be friends.

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

@Timcast Me

[Crystal Keara @CrystalKeara]

The entire point is that the evidence presented at this point does not prove Tyler’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. That leaves room to consider other possibilities—including the possibility that others were involved. We don’t have to prove an alternative theory in order to question whether the theory being presented has been proven. That’s it. That’s the point.