@bobdoessports Around Iowa soon? We are doing something a bit crazy and challenging by attempting a Guinness World Record for fastest round by a team. https://t.co/gQgI5wwU9B
@ChadLeistikow@andygreder Hey @ChadLeistikow, I'm assuming this didn't come up in the call, but did Carollo/Shaw indicate the rule (section/article) used in justifying how "invalid signal" was reviewable? So many review rules, which one(s) did they use? Team could argue this non-reviewable.
@l_shoes@SoundOFF13 Will have to look for the full transcript in which article 3 or article 4 was used in this ruling. Seems per their comments they are using article 1.
@l_shoes@SoundOFF13 Ref stated they reviewed and ruled on an invalid fair catch signal... which is not explicitly stated as a reviewable play. Dead ball was the resulting rule, not what was reviewed.
@KXnODrive
Rule 12 SECTION 2. Eligibility for Instant Replay
Kicks ARTICLE 4 Reviewable plays....
g. Receiving team advancing after a fair catch signal
Rule 6, Sec 5
Invalid Signals: ARTICLE 3. a. A catch after an invalid signal is not a fair catch....
Not reviewable...!