trk

[Paul Walsh @Paul__Walsh]

Ursula von der Leyen has confirmed that everyone in the EU will need to use the EU's app for identity authentication before being able to access or post on social media websites.

🇪🇺 As an expert in online child safety, I am here to expose the misinformation and misdirection in von der Leyen's statements.

Today von der Leyen said:

"This is not about whether children can access social media, it is about whether social media can access our children".

💡The first part is true. This isn't about children. It's about surveillance and combating political dissent. A state that can't control its own citizens is more dangerous than a state rife with criminals. The second part is a PR soundbite that politicians are using like a campaign slogan straight out of 1984.

🇪🇺"The question is no longer if children face risks online, but what can we do to give children a safer start online".

💡No. You can't give children a "safer start" online any more than you can offline. In the offline world, the government doesn't enforce curfews or ban children from entering liquor stores, bars or restaurants. That's a parent's responsibility. The digital world should be no different.

🇪🇺"The age verification app is one of the tools to get it done".

💡This is a contradiction because she also said "It won't be foolproof".

🇪🇺"It's easy to use, it is privacy preserving and it is open source".

💡The app was compromised as soon as it was released. "Privacy-preserving" age verification is an oxymoron. You can't verify a person's age without verifying their identity. Where or how that age is shared afterwards is irrelevant.

🇪🇺"This is basically about putting back the power into the hands of parents".

💡More from 1984. The EU is doing the opposite. Parents are having their authority stripped by politicians who think they know better. Many parents are capable and unaffected by peer pressure, and they know how to use parental controls to block any app classified as 13+. Some teens are safe, their parents trust them, and the state has no business overruling that trust.

🇪🇺"We don't give our children keys to the car before they have their licence"

💡Comparing an app to a car is a false equivalence used to justify mass surveillance. Governments don't decide when a young person is ready for car keys, guardians do.

💡Forcing every adult and child into a biometric checkpoint just to use an app or website is not licensing drivers. It's the state seizing everyone's keys, locking the garage, and forcing every driver to ask a private company for permission to take a drive.

💡 This is a gross, unethical overreach that strips authority from parents while imposing state sanctioned identity verification on every adult who doesn't even have a child.

💡Additionally, people who pass a test, obtain a licence and drive a car aren't forced to use an app to constantly authenticate their suitability to drive.

🇪🇺"We do not let them buy alcohol until they are legally allowed"

💡False equivalence. We don't force every person to show ID at a shopping mall entrance just because a few people might buy alcohol with a meal at a restaurant. Some parents are okay with their 12 year-old going to the mall with friends while others aren't. Either way, it's their choice. Whatever irresponsible decisions some parents might make, every adult in the country shouldn't be forced to pay the price.

🇪🇺"It won't be foolproof"

💡This is all the proof we need to show that the EU and every government know that banning social media for teens won't protect them. When pressed by journalists about VPNs being used to circumvent a ban, politicians always state the ban isn't a silver bullet and will take time. The Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan went as far as to say "we know it's not the solution".

💡Either age verification works, or it doesn't. As a technical expert in this space, I can tell you there are no additional steps to take and no progress to be made. Either the approach does what it is supposed to do, or it's not fit for purpose. If they claim a bulletproof solution is coming, it can only mean one thing. They intend to ban or restrict VPNs to people who verify their identity.

🇪🇺"It will take time to invite the cultural change that is already taking shape in our society, just as it took time to outlaw drink driving, just as it took time to use seatbelts in the cars. Great change never happens overnight, but when it comes to our safety it is always worth it".

💡Comparing a social media ban and age verification to seatbelts is a completely broken analogy. Seatbelts are a safety feature that protects children while allowing them to travel in a car. A ban doesn't give kids a seatbelt. It kicks them out of the car entirely.

💡Instead of supporting parents who want to guide their own children through the digital world, this heavy-handed law strips away parental authority by banning the apps and websites that many parents are perfectly fine with and actively monitor.

💡Furthermore, enforcing these bans requires biometric age verification, which means forcing millions of adult citizens to scan their IDs, faces or credit cards just to browse the internet. That isn't a common-sense traffic law.

💡It's a digital checkpoint on every street. True safety means teaching kids how to navigate the digital world safely with real guardrails and parental guidance, not burning down digital spaces for everyone under the guise of protection.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to ban teens from social media so every person is forced to verify their identity before they can read, share or post anything online. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous content.

🇪🇺☠️ The EU wants to enforce "Chat Control" so every app has to monitor everything people say privately inside it, including apps with end-to-end encryption. In their words, this is to protect children from dangerous criminals.

💡Where this ends

🇪🇺 "If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever".

George Orwell, 1984.

[IT Guy @T3chFalcon]

Dutch intelligence agencies got caught training AI on citizen data they weren't supposed to have.

the CTIVD, the Netherlands' official intelligence oversight body, published a report finding that AIVD and MIVD staff accessed and retained massive bulk datasets in ways that violate Dutch law.

names. phone numbers. location data. social media. communication content. millions of entries. some from government sources. some commercially purchased. some stolen by criminals and bought on the dark web.

and then Bits of Freedom, the Dutch digital rights organization, flagged something buried in the report: the agencies appear to be training their own AI models on this data.

this is not the first time.

in 2020, the same watchdog found the same agencies had retained citizen data far beyond legal limits. after complaints, they were ordered to delete it.

six years later: same report. same finding. same agencies.

but now with AI in the loop.

the data that was illegally retained is now reportedly being used to train models that will make future surveillance faster, more accurate, and more autonomous.

you cannot opt out. Unlike commercial AI companies, there is no settings menu. no privacy center. no right to delete that you can actually exercise.

Bits of Freedom put it directly:

"They seem to be buying data from criminal data breaches. aren't they supposed to be protecting us from those?"

[trk @csgotrk]

@MickeBJohansson @BirroMarcus Vi är många som gör det. Klubbtillhörigheten föds man med!

[trk @csgotrk]

@MaxedOut57 What’s ethical about training for Dennis Mitchell?

[Erik Arnell @ArnellOErik]

Underfinansiera. Privatisera. Upprepa.

[mrdelivery @mrdelivery1620]

@YungxJayy @TerribleId59801 It’s who they have always been

[Jamarrius @YungxJayy]

I say I hate Israel, and then I read something like this, and I realize I don’t hate them nearly enough. These people are sick beyond words.

[0x45 @0x45o]

no need for cameras in my ass, they passed "chat control" (on 4th try btw, and that is called democracy)

they will now be able to read all of your messages, welcome to 1984

[Femte juli @femtejuli]

I går beslutade Europaparlamentet att göra ett tredje försök att förlänga Chat Control 1. Omröstning i sakfrågan hålls på torsdag. Hela processen är ett demokratiskt haveri.
https://t.co/6fm41gJGL0

[Helen Andrews @herandrews]

Soviet law is hilarious. A factory manager was imprisoned by the NKVD as a “Trotskyist” and sentenced to a labor camp, but then Yezhov fell and he was one of the political prisoners released. He got his job back—and sued for back pay for the months he was in prison. Successfully.

[trk @csgotrk]

@svtjacob Glädjande för sporten.

[f4mi ‼️ @f4micom]

are you fucking kidding me

he was talking about how the new chatcontrol vote technically is not even legal according to our own laws and they CUT OFF HIS MICROPHONE AFTER 60 SECONDS

this is INSANE

[Femte juli @femtejuli]

I morgon tisdag röstar Europaparlamentet om att ta upp frågan om en förlängning av Chat Control 1, igen. Blir det ett ja blir en sådan väldigt svår att stoppa – trots att parlamentet redan sagt nej två gånger.

Allt du behöver veta: https://t.co/Yp4a7OmtCl

[trk @csgotrk]

@Gr3venn @Xarfranpsyket @Alexand62561078 @ERANFHC Imponerande källkritik du besitter. USA säger att alla länder dom anfaller är onda superdiktaturer och därför är det okej. Ryssland säger förstås samma sak om Ukraina. Inse att det alltid är fel att anfalla ett annat land och släpp dubbelmoralen.

[MR. OBVIOUS @ObviousRises]

BREAKING: A Ford Regional Maintenance Supervisor just revealed "smart" features coming to all future vehicles...

-collecting your data/basing your insurance on it
-facial scanning/heart monitoring to detect "impairment"
-in-car surveillance (2027) that decides if you are "fit to drive" (make your car inoperable via "kill switch")
-if your vehicle determines you are under in the influence it won't start and will notify the authorities to come arrest you
-infrared cameras will continually monitor potential impairment including pupil size, etc. (vital signs)
-will actively monitor "key words" for wrongthink
-tech that detects "road rage" to prevent "erratic driving"
-this is just the tip of the iceberg

Needless to say this is extremely disturbing information and likely a standard many car companies/the government will push for in the future. I will 100% never drive a car that has ANY of these technologies and will actively destroy/boycott any vehicle/manufacture that employs this technology.

There are countless potential problems with this technology as well, imagine if you you have a medical condition (or the "machine algorithms") bug out and you're sent flying off the highway at 85 MPH (or if the CIA/FBI want you gone) this is a gross breach of trust and yet another disgusting attempt at a 24/7 subservience state.

People need to know about this before its too late.

[trk @csgotrk]

@CitiusMag @UGATrack Nike and doping, name a more iconic duo

[Victor Pressfeldt @vpressfeldt]

Spännande vändning givet att det i det närmaste klassades som landsförräderi att påtala att Ryssland (av allt att döma) inte stod bakom sprängningen av Nord Stream https://t.co/WxtlKAd6cJ

[Glenn Meder @GlennMeder]

However much you distrust Big Tech, it's not enough.

[trk @csgotrk]

@RahjaiT Imo big 4 for fast times: Paris, Eugene, Monaco, Silesia