tanuo

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@AlanShao111 这野人魔了

[Tibo @thsottiaux]

@trq212 Yay! This is the way. Come to the light

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@fzmta 张高丽���会

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@youyouyue7474 @realsinya 没有人是天生的左派还是右派，意识形态都是政党的引导和现实的格局决定的，台湾这个国家一直生活在中美角力的重压下，政治重心只会逐渐右移

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@lizenan3 楠神，他的量化，我很怕

[tanuo @ctanuo]

change your desgin of next generation of iphone pro

[John Ternus @johnternus]

hello

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@realsinya 在中国的民权运动中，李颖是阿尔敏，你是吉克，而我们需要的是艾伦耶格尔

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@laozhouhengmei 孙宇晨的道德品行且不论，吃瓜八卦的观众也要遭受道德指责吗

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@Yelvlv930 据我分析，景甜应该是给了，她不给的话，她可能还仍然还是孙哥心中可望而不可及的高岭之花；但是给完就不一样了，孙哥就会开始给她定价，开始计算风险，开始抛弃沉没成本，当孙哥从熟睡的景甜身边起身，开始审视那份背调结果的时候，在他敲下那行提示词之前，他就已经有了答案，只是在等一个肯定的回复

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@SpoxCHN_MaoNing 这电影还不如牛来

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@Akaimuys 这一盒里才5个，每个500日元左右，普通的数字盒有14个，总价大概是7000日元

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@laozhouhengmei 我猜饶毅吧，他之前就这件事明显在墙内有很多话想说，最后轻轻放下，化作一声叹息。

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@dongbeibisima89 韩国人不是本质弗雷尔卓德吗，张元英就山东的

[Rovier Chan @Rovierchan]

@amber_digit2 Overachieving math genius obsessed with anime girls is the most Chinese shit ever.

[Toni Kroos @ToniKroos]

Football won

[tanuo @ctanuo]

中国政府正在尝试加速ai替代程序员的工作，这在他们的五年规划中已经写明白了，开源的模型有助于这一点

[Dean W. Ball @deanwball]

Some observations on Kimi:

1. It's a very good model! I don't think its performance can be explained away by distillation or anything like that. In agentic coding sessions, it seems pretty much on par with the best public models of Q1 2026. In my fairly limited use, it also seemed very token hungry. It's not obvious to me that this model is actually that cheap to run.

2. I am personally surprised the Chinese state continues to allow the open sourcing of models this good, given potential risks. To be clear, I *myself* might be fine with models presenting this level of marginal risk being open weight, but I am surprised that China is fine with it. I suspect the reason they are is 75% explained by strategic blindness/lack of AGI-pilledness (the CCP is very Yann Lecun-y in its views of AI). The other 25% or so is their lack of compute for customer inference (making China's open-weight strategy an unintended byproduct of US export controls) and the normal Chinese strategy of aggressive exports. For the companies, as opposed to the government, the decision to open source is partially ideological and partially because they are behind, and they know that very few people would pay for sub-frontier models from China.

3. Open-weight models are inherently decelerationist, and I'm continually surprised to see the so-called "accelerationists" so excited about open-weight models. I suspect the reason they are is that they know open-weight models are effectively ungovernable, and they simply like the overall cloak of ungovernability open-weight models create over the whole of AI. It's not a bad strategy; it reminds me of James Scott's recounting of the hill people in "the art of not being governed." Still, in the end, open-weight models deter further AI capex.

4. One probable outcome of an open-weight-model-dominant world is full AI communism, which is precisely what China proposes: rather than a market product, AI is a "public good" which will ultimately be provided by the state as a kind of "digital public infrastructure." This future strikes me as a dystopian hellscape, but I've never met an open-weight models advocate who doesn't ultimately concede this is where things end. You'd be surprised how many 'accelerationists' lobbied me, while I was in government, to support an eleven or twelve-figure federally funded data center so that startups could train models at a subsidy and then give them away for free. There was no other way for AI to progress, they said. Perhaps this is the logical end state of things. Nonetheless, I find myself surprised to see supposed accelerationists excited about such an outcome. I think many of them just don't know what they're doing. Many accelerationists do not view the creation and serving of frontier models as a legitimate business.

5. I would guess that the Trump Administration will at some point realize that their best strategy here would be to create large amounts of regulatory risk around the use of open-weight Chinese models. You don't need to "ban open source" (one of the dumber motifs of AI policy discussion). You just need to direct every agency to issue soft law that creates FUD. "A Federal Reserve Advisory Bulletin found that there may be backdoors in Chinese AI models." It needn't be that well justified. You just create enough regulatory risk that every regulated enterprise backs off. You probably don't want to create so much regulatory risk that you scare off the hyperscalers from serving Chinese models; this will just drive startups to sketchier providers. There's a happy middle ground here. I'd assume they will do some version of this.

6. It's probably true that open-weight models of this capability make the world a bit more dangerous, but not so much more that you'll really notice. At some point the models will be capable enough that you will notice. "A nonliving, invisible, dangerous, and infinitely self-replicating agent escaped from a Chinese lab," you say? Color me shocked.

[tanuo @ctanuo]

为什么还有人相信中共控制了2020年的美国大选？他们为什么要把拜登推向总统的位置？如果中共真的操纵了美国大选，那么他们绝对会毫不犹豫地让特朗普连任，在拜登时期，中国经历严重的经济衰退和外交危机，直到特朗普重新上台中国的出口贸易才回暖，拜登时期的美国政府才是最令中共窒息的

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@BilibiliGaming 4848484848

[tanuo @ctanuo]

@laozhouhengmei 我倒觉得他这球从一开始就想着传哈兰德，不然不会接到球就减速，如果自己想进球应该直接蹚一步单刀了