@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie > [briefly taking a break from violently intubating yourself on Sam Huntington’s cock] “some people’s world view is too constrained by an American perspective”
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie No, because you seem to be really invested in treating the obvious truth that some Shias and some Sunnis want to kill eachother in some contexts as some unique, non-contingent, irreducible, supersedingly singular historical force.
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie Sure they do, about as much as Catholics and Protestants. It’s almost like the intensity of sectarian violence is largely downstream of material/historical/political conditions and conflicts. And anything can be a non-idpol argument if you just decide you dont want it to be
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie I think it’s a transparently dumb as fuck gambit to reposition goalposts into your preferred rhetorical territory, and I’m rigourously rejecting your incessant attempts at said transparently dumb as fuck gambit. So now you’re calling me sensitive I guess.
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie factional violence sorting out over existing cultural and religious fault lines, especially when those fault lines have been actively encouraged and cultivated, is, y’know, the historical norm, dipshit.
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie My point is the fucking onion was making jokes about how destabilizing it would be. Anyone with half a brain knew what happened could happen, and anyone with a quarter of a brain would have made none of the myriad idiotic choices the US made after the invasion that guaranteed it
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie And that only an idiot, or someone (and here we come full circle) being world historically willfully obtuse in the service of a transparently bad faith reading, would ever be confused by this common and simple linguistic construction?
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie And that only an idiot, or someone (and here we come full circle) being world historically willfully obtuse in the service of a transparently bad faith reading, would ever be confused by this common and simple linguistic construction?
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie Wait, are you not aware that, in a coloquial setting, “[Noun] [is so singularly responsible for the circumstances that produced X that they can effectively be said to have have directly [verb]ed X]” is often shortened to “[Noun] [verb]ed X” for brevity and conversational clarity?
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie 2. My dude, you are *literally* arguing the identity of those involved in acts of political violence supercedes the relevance of the proximate political causes of that political violence 3.
>“be normal”
>”but but but it was mooslams who did most of the killing aktualy checkm8”
@0dCaiman@I_Artorius@CantEverDie 1. Lmao yes they fucking did. I personally knew like 3 christians and a “pagan” who signed up to go to Iraq to “kill Arabs” for “doing 911”. A globalized conflict in the birthplace of civilization sucked in ppl with cultural allegiances to parties in that conflict?! wowtrvthnuke