@NLH2224 If you don't mind, I've been looking for something I can't remember if you tweeted. It was about Materialism or something, and how it actually has roots in Ancient Greece? Or maybe it was actually the Hegelian Dialectic that had it's origins or a version of it in Ancient Greece.
@delegad0zer0 What does this mean? If you don't mind me asking. Like from the original tweet to here.
Like what does it have to do with Trotskyism and China.
@marx2thamax@Panduendito Even if it "ended" are you denying the benefits? You've moved the conversation away from benefitting to trying to wiggle around the definitions of MOP and indigenous. Ironically because, as the original tweet said, you people cannot admit you benefit from settler colonialism.
@marx2thamax@blackvisenya100@2earth2dove Since when are Palestinians Roman, how can the Palestinians be settlers but also the Romans colonizers? The Palestinians also include the lineage of the prior Jewish population. You're having a manic episode because someone dared to point out you benefit from Settler Colonialism
@NLH2224 You can defend Marxism along these same lines. We can measure the effect of wealth on people, alienation. There are non-capitalist economic structures.
Beyond that, the study of History is inference not observation, as far as I know. Also depends on your definition of "hierarchy"
@lecheevalier@lucifem_@the_big_put@t4tellurnyx Veracity doesn't matter, nor does ability to refute.
If the very fact that a statement or narrative can be used in inopportune ways, then why advocate for anything?
You could have a point here, but you tried justifying/intellectualising your stupid responses.
@t4tellurnyx Porn account millennial posting your way to pure Communism.
Doesn't matter which sects or thinkers of "Communism" you align with, if any of them saw you now they'd kill themselves and burn all of their work.
@tokyodilfi958@BmoreOrganized But they quoted a Trotskyist using the same meme, how can this be a "Stalinist" issue?
Also, I assume the tweet means that Trotskyists wrongly criticise NatLib in silly ways. But I'm not sure.