Ayúdenme a llegar a más personas y pagar el tratamiento de alguien con TOC. Un simple retuit ayuda. Tenemos 47 días para recaudar los fondos y menos de 1 mes para la carrera. (Hoy correré 13 km, ¿quién se anima a donar?) https://t.co/gkcmOdAr2V
⚠️ ¡Atención! ⚠️
📣 Solicitamos el apoyo de nuestra #ComunidadUdeG para encontrar a Aldo González Sevilla, estudiante del @CUCS.
Cualquier información sobre su paradero, favor de comunicarla al 📞 33 3145 6314 o ✉️ [email protected].
Colin Cowherd and Jason McIntyre have an entire conversation about trading draft picks for Shohei Ohtani... which you can't do in Major League Baseball.
The anonymous imperialists at neoliberal bible The Economist referred to Latin American workers as "useless" and blamed them for supposed "unproductivity", while ignoring how US neocolonialism (which The Economist strongly supports) has violently attacked and often overthrown any government in the region dedicated to an independent national project of economic development.
The reality is that US imperialism has intentionally underdeveloped Latin America, preventing the region from developing, because US corporations need Latin American countries to remain resource extraction hubs, for cheap exports of agricultural goods, minerals, and other commodities.
In addition to overthrowing dozens of democratically elected governments in the region, US imperialism has economically subordinated Latin American countries, destroying any indigenous industrial competitors (de-industrialization at the barrel of a gun), and forcing the region to remain dependent on imports of high value-added products, technologies, and capital goods from the wealthy core capitalist countries.
If they are so "useless", why do so many US corporations rely on exploiting extremely low-paid Latin American workers, using them for highly labor-intensive, low value-added production (of garments and agricultural products, for instance)?
The reality is the exact opposite: Latin Americans are often forced (by poverty, as a product of underdevelopment) to work much harder in much worse conditions than relatively more comfortable workers in the Global North, grueling in labor-intensive (read: back-breaking) industries that have been outsourced to the South.
But The Economist blames the victims, like always. It is fulfilling its class role.
Leaked documents show the US government is angry that Mexico's left-wing President AMLO is prioritizing social spending to help poor and working people - building infrastructure, raising wages, boosting pensions - instead of spending more on militarization
https://t.co/DZ9gHW3ESn