@jlandsme_93 Spot on. Aside from wasting a review, there is no accountability for players using it at odds with its purpose. I would support match referees judging quality of DRS reviews, any considered “poor” carry penalty points towards match suspensions
@lenphil29 Would have been an open and shut case for Westpac if their management and HR did the bare minimum. The case put forward by the employee is weaker than Massimo’s right foot
@lenphil29 TDLR;
- employee submits FWA to work remotely full time because they moved 80km away
- employer takes 2 months to respond in writing, well beyond the 21 day window
- employer response is fanciful, clown college stuff that could have been written by Barnaby
- employee wins
You know which rallies and protests are shit?
All of em.
Find me one that has been the catalyst for material cultural change. If there are any, they’re rarer than hens teeth.
Just an obscene waste of time, energy, effort and resources.
@KosSamaras “When you oppose WFH” such a disingenuous angle - the benefits of hybrid working are widely accepted across society, any opposition to the policy is in having it mandated and getting in the way of businesses and employees managing this with relative autonomy
Working from home is a benefit and should remain that way. It is a way for businesses to be kept honest on providing flexibility in the work place and be an employer of choice. It does not need to be regulated!
This is how you get politics right. Working from home isn’t just a perk for a privileged few in white-collar jobs, as some conservatives like to claim. It’s essential across a wide range of middle and lower-income occupations, many of them held by women, who rely on remote work to manage rising work demands and the relentless pressures of the cost of living. It’s also a right that the entire family relies on and supports. So the electoral politics of opposing this is akin to… May 3rd.