Witnessing morally grey characters in any media is disliked by many people partly because if an "evil" person can think and behave like a normal person too, it means a normal person is not as far from evil than they'd like to believe.
Citizenship is a not a title you fall into when you live in the city. It's a job title where your duty is to look after the city and it's people. In return for a job well done, the government "pays" you in infrastructure and services.
Started reading Happy City by Charles Montgomery -
Time and time again, a city is observed to be happier when people move around and socialise naturally, which goes on to prove that private automobiles and dedicated infrastructure around them harms cities and people's happiness.
The more traffic a street has, the less likely people are to engage with each other. The more parking a shop has, the less likely people are to recognise each other. High speed transport stops convivalism. And you realise, the way you build a city or a street, is a choice.
I think one of the most urgent meta-cognitive skills one can hone today is knowing when to be lazy and when not to be.
With AI, there is an ever-increasing pressure to be lazy with everything, but that comes with the risk of losing what’s important or meaningful.
Sprawls also deprive people of a social life due to dispersion. People are found to be happiest in a dense city that has mixed space buildings, and plenty of greenery and natural structures around them. A good city must fulfill all these needs.
I'm noticing there are so many cities around the world that were at their worst before they improved and now rank as some of the best to live in. Will that time come for Indian cities? Or did we have it before and I missed that cycle by a thousand years?
AI slop in office spaces has an interesting outcome. People are having to read through the long, verbose text more than ever. Suddenly the ones who aren't naturally inclined towards reading end up using more cognitive power than people who are natural readers.
Concluding the book with a personal observation that all conclusions drawn in the book are a result of small scale experiments and that is data extralolated to recommend policy and personal actions. While relatable and maybe usable, they should be taken with a grain of salt.
Reading Predictably Irrational by Dan Ariely -
It's a book that talks about how most people believe their decision-making to be rational & grounded in facts, while in reality we "predictably" make irrational decisions due to hidden drivers, internal and external
#novel_thoughts
Dishonesty also comes easier if the direct impact of action is not cash. This means electronic theft is easier to do as it's one step removed from cash. This tactic is employed by many services to "steal", ex. credit card interest charges, etc.