Curious Minds

Former Ontario Public Servant Healthcare, Privacy & FOI & Records Management Professional Transparency, Ethics & Accountability
Not for Profit Founder

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

Five years ago, I believed our institutions were as transparent and accountable as they claimed to be.

Working in healthcare, privacy, and government—and later experiencing those same systems from the other side—changed my perspective.

👇

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

The document on the left was the initial ATIA response; on the right is the same document, ordered un-redacted, by the Office of the Information Commissioner. Red highlights show what was initially kept hidden (to protect Pfizer.)
Sourced from:
https://t.co/2937lhlCKr
ATIA👇

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

So this is *really* not a good look. And disturbing. Health Canada (HC) tried to keep hidden, under Sections 20(1)(b) and (c) of the Access to Information Act, the fact that Pfizer's SV40 DNA fragment "trade secret" in the C19💉 was "unnecessary"; and HC's order to remove it.

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

“In all, I represented 212 families across 40 states. Of the 212 cases, I won 72 where ivermectin was actually given. […] Only three people died. That is a 95.8% success rate on survival. Tragically, of the 140 cases where I couldn't get into court quick enough, or I lost, every single person died.” — Ralph Lorigo, Esq.

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

Can you imagine if Health Canada sued Pfizer for failing to disclose the DNA fragments in C19 💉 batches? Think about how awkward it would be if Health Canada pleaded it would have never authorized the jabs had it been disclosed from the get-go.
Pfizer’s calling their bluff.

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

Pfizer may have chosen not to flag the SV40 sequence because the label could trigger added regulatory scrutiny (which it did) over eg residual DNA integration/ oncogenicity. Pfizer may have deliberately avoided highlighting it for that reason. This is ChatGPT speculating...🧐

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@ccleighton @fordnation @PBethlenfalvy @CBCNews @CTVToronto @CTVWindsor @globeandmail @TorontoStar Thank you for your support

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@MarkAGirard1 Ohhh I remember this

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@LionAdvocacy @markhollandCA looking back, do you see the issues?

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@LionAdvocacy Yep, it definitely was presented and on record.

[Lion Advocacy @LionAdvocacy]

A lot of individual freedoms were taken away during Covid - "for the public good": freedom to make basic medical decisions; freedom to practice medicine; freedom to express concerns; freedom of C19 💉injured folks to form support groups.
Time to recognize their sacrifice.

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@DKAstrology 🤗💗

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@IanCopeland5 @stkirsch Why only PubMed?

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@LessonsInTimezz @BreakingNewsFi2 @IanCopeland5 How do they diagnose polio and the symptoms, anything else align similar that can come along since

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@IanCopeland5 Lots of different names for polio these days

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@IanCopeland5 @MakisMedicine Oh cool, can you share the link to the data

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@DKAstrology Bhahahahahahahhah!

[Dr Mark Trozzi MD @DrTrozzi]

On April 30, 2021, the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario issued a statement threatening doctors who spoke about what they were seeing on the front lines.

Derek Sloan @TrueDerekSloan called them out: a governing body meant to protect the public was instead suppressing legitimate scientific inquiry.

Sloan now leads the Ontario Party, who are still fighting for COVID accountability and speaking the truth.

https://t.co/Dp9dvgtjJ2

[Aaron Siri @AaronSiriSG]

On the topic of splitting up the MMR vaccine into 3 separate vaccines, everyone should know that in 2012, two Merck virologists came forward and explained that around 2005 when Merck sought to change the label on its MMR vaccine and approval for ProQuad (a combination MMR and varicella vaccine), it “falsely certified as having an efficacy rate that is significantly higher than it actually is.” (Complaint ¶ 1.)

As detailed in the whistleblower lawsuit, Merck obtained a license for its mumps vaccine in 1967. (Comp. ¶ 16.) In the late 1990s, to obtain approval for ProQuad and change the label on its MMR vaccine, Merck needed to reconfirm its claims of efficacy for its mumps vaccine made thirty years prior. (Comp.. ¶ 22.) Merck’s virologists working on testing the efficacy of the mumps vaccine revealed that after Merck could not demonstrate a 95% efficacy for its mumps vaccine, the results were simply fraudulently falsified to achieve this result. (Comp. ¶¶ 15-131.)

As explained by Merck’s virologists, Merck took blood samples pre-vaccinated with the mumps vaccine and then exposed them to the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 25-28.) When a test against a live strain of mumps would not yield a 95% efficacy, Merck tried to improperly obtain this rate using an attenuated strain of the mumps virus. (Comp. ¶¶ 29-30.) When this still would not achieve 95% efficacy, Merck tried different virus dilutions, different straining procedure, and even more liberal antibody counting techniques. (Comp. ¶¶ 31-32.) The Merck lab even improperly added animal antibodies to the blood samples and still could not achieve a 95% efficacy rate. (Comp. ¶¶ 33-39.)

When it was clear that even improper testing techniques could not produce the desired result, the test reports were simply falsified. (Comp. ¶¶ 40-51.) According to the Merck virologists, to document the desired efficacy rate, Merck destroyed result sheets and falsified various documents. (Id.) The Merck virologists claim this fraud was done with the direct authority and approval of Merck’s senior management. (Comp. ¶¶ 52-58.)

Now you know.

This may explain why outbreaks of mumps still regularly occur in highly vaccinated populations. See, e.g.:
https://t.co/YgTukQi0eg(317 cases; 89% had received at least 2 MMR doses); https://t.co/i7vsAVGixp(281 cases; high two-dose coverage among university-affiliated cases, with community spread); https://t.co/dKYuleKBM2(301 student cases; all patients with complications had received at least 2 doses); https://t.co/b4YB8ePKPG(42 cases; all patients had ≥2 documented MMR doses; campus two-dose coverage exceeded 99%); https://t.co/PtJBYPwsKt(29 cases; 76% had received the recommended 2 dose); https://t.co/W0IqwV4pZd(CDC: “experts aren’t sure why vaccinated people still get mumps…).

Complaint: https://t.co/hbnjc7YNfa

[Curious Minds @curiousminds416]

@IanCopeland5 You do acknowledge that to date though, there hasn’t been funding directed towards this in the past and for some reason the government is against funding it, so now that’s it being done, have you looked into any of the case studies?

[William Makis @MakisMedicine]

BREAKING NEWS: There are now 6 Clinical Trials Examining the use of Ivermectin in Cancer !

This has Big Pharma in an absolute panic !🚨

You see Big Pharma assets like Dr. Brian Goldman @NightShiftMD and @IanCopeland5 attacking and bashing Ivermectin use in Cancer. But why? 🤔

Why aren't they excited that Cancer Institutions like Moffitt Cancer Center are finally jumping on board?

Here are the 6 Clinical Trials (more are coming):

1. Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (NCT05318469)

2. University of Florida (NCT07487805

3. University of Miami (Shanta Dhar et al)

4. Tampa General Hospital (Ivan Borello et al)

5. Florida Intl University (Diana Azzam et al)

6. Moffitt Cancer Center (Chang Jiang et al)

Two will soon be completed (Cedars-Sinai in 2026-10 and U of Florida 2027-09)

and several more are coming VERY SOON! 😃

The Cancer Drug cartel is currently estimated at $233 billion revenue annually and it's about to get shaken up. 💪