@proledelendaest I don't disagree with that. I do not mean that study is wrong, per se. But the expectation that in studying M&E down to the last letter you will find ready made, correct answers to every single issue that may arise in the present rather than men reacting to their own situations.
I think the fact that gigaquoting has replaced serious engagement is, on the net, good. Don’t get me wrong, it is good to engage with your opponent’s strongest arguments, but you really shouldn’t spend 1000 hours arguing with people who you would liquidate in the Red Terror.
"Capital intensive industries which benefit immensely from economies of scale can be more expensive than the alternatives if there is no economy of scale for such an industry in the first instance"
Holy shit
🤫 has anyone ever taught you how to defend yourself if guys mess with you?
🗣️ I took a Karate class a few years ago. Don’t remember much about it, sadly
https://t.co/d1gaqaC0qZ
🤫 u were the one person who actually made things feel calm. like no drama, no fake energy, just real vibes
🗣️ Okay, I’m happy I made you feel calm, whoever you are
https://t.co/s1fWiy9KbB
@maaaaaaaagd I'm criticizing the tendency to treat their writings as a kind of scripture, where every contemporary problem is resolved through textual exegesis rather than concrete materialist analysis.
@maaaaaaaagd Not really. The invariance of the communist programme concerns the continuity of Marxism's fundamental principles, not the idea that Marx and Engels personally provided answers to every conceivable question.