@LordElyndor@LomaTana16180 If your argument is that dutch people lived on the continuous physical land that would eventually become the country called South Africa first, then you are just wrong.
Bantu people had been living in the East and the North of South Africa when the dutch arrived.
@romanhelmetguy Most jobs are going to be in oversight, essentially.
Not because they are needed, but because "human in the loop" regulations would create them and they would be a necessary bullshit job to keep the circular flow of economic activity going.
We're playing around with definitions here.
There is the political entity called the Republic of South Africa and the physical continent we call Africa.
Various ethnicities (Including "White people") were here when RSA was created, so none of them are necessarily immigrants.
If you want to define "immigrants" as someone who is part of an ethnic group that originally immigrated from another continent, then essentially everyone who isn't "black" in Africa or Amazigh (and indigenous ethnicities ), in North Africa, is an immigrant to some other continent.
But that's not really a useful definition, because than most of humanity are "immigrants".
@PFraudbum@iTriggerLibs69@HiOmeguits@Awk20000 True. It's also crazy how Asmon's fans are now losing their minds over the mildest of disagreement from people who are otherwise friendly with Asmon.
@iTriggerLibs69@HiOmeguits@Awk20000 He didn't say they deserve it. He essentially said that it's ok, because they have no future anyway.
As long as we are comparing. Asmon has said that he would rather spend money on rockets than feed starving kids. Even if you share his opinion, that's a lack of compassion.
@Awk20000 It seems like he is mixing up what Destiny said with what Nick said. Nick was just being nihilistic.
“They don’t have much to live for anyway… it’s okay.”
“When they’re older, every job is going to be AI. Everything they learn is on ChatGPT. There is no future.”
@Asmon_Updates If your view of Africa, and anything related to international affairs, does not incorporate the IMF, World Bank, Central Banks and credit creation, you are essentially clueless about what is going on in the world.
@SamFugu@AutisticClip They get more out than they put in.
NGOs are also incentivized to perpetuate the problems they are paid salaries to solve, same with most government agencies.
Look up Public Choice Theory.
@TexasRedRacing@Not_Dreugen@Awk20000 I would also add that the conversation was about how dehumanizing people creates a permission structure for state violence and abuse. This guy tried to make it about enforcing immigration, which is not what is in contention start with.
@TexasRedRacing@Not_Dreugen@Awk20000 Most of the issues happen once they are arrested, there have been reports of abuse in custody, and Asmon has said it's a good thing.
You may be presenting another false dilemma ("either we abuse undocumented immigrants, or we don't have borders").
This coward blocked me so I am going to say this here.
Facts show that the certainty of a punishment is more effective than the magnitude of punishment. Systems which focused on education have lower recidivism.
And abusing people in custody is morally bankrupt and uncivilized.
Also, these are mostly otherwise normal people who are on the wrong side of a bureaucratic system, the idea that they deserve to be abused in custody is retarded and you lose the moral high ground just by suggesting that it is a good thing.
@KiburenKibu@Awk20000 Who is "these people"? Nick thinks that Asmon is nice to him too.
But he probably sees the contrast between the version of Asmon who is sitting at his PC all day scrolling twitter and Asmon irl.
You realize there is a difference between having a strict immigration policy and dehumanizing people, right?
You are making a false dillemma here (a logical fallacy).
An alternative would be that If an individual citizen with a good reputation wants you in the country and you have passed a security background check, you may enter, and there are limits to how many people an individual can invite.
This is a similar policy to what gated communities and many companies use.
This would be an individualist policy, rather than collectivist state run social engineering.
@TexasRedRacing@Not_Dreugen@Awk20000 The dilineation is relevant because a state can make unjust laws, for example. In that context those who are disobedient can be engaging in ethical behavior, and thus it is not reasonable to dehumanize them.