@waffelhauss @CabbyDM As for the original image, the source linking it to the brutality of the Belgian Congo is historian Paul Van Damme's 2020 book 'Wit-zwart in zwart-wit'.
@waffelhauss @CabbyDM I can understand not finding OP's photo immediately - but are you really saying you didn't find a single thing corroborating the 1958 Worlds Fair 'Human Zoos'?
@djwhatley@lastpositivist The original claim here is that specific problems occur when a small segment of a population has all the power/resources to run things. Your counterpoint is a scenario where the entire population (2 people) decide cooperatively how to run things.
@SickoBoingo@goof@_alialkhatib@blprnt Not sure if we can say the AI didn't have access to any info about the support-recipients. Video says their initial message was sent to ChatGPT, which could include disclosure of some very personal details (eg. trauma history). This could be ingested back into the LLM.
@SickoBoingo@goof@_alialkhatib@blprnt Yep, my point above is that there's an inconsistency between the project's narrative about why people eventually didn't like the assistive responses (they felt disappointed when they found out about the AI) and the idea that they were fully informed prior to its use on them.
@_alialkhatib@goof@blprnt Handling that responsibly seems like it requires disenchanting support providers on the harmful potentials of LLMs from the get-go. Doing that effectively for the support providers and not for the support receivers seems pretty deceptive.
@_alialkhatib@goof@blprnt I feel like the P2P ethics deserve a thread of their own. If KoKo's helping me help people, but ChatGPT suggests a message that's harmful (which I don't recognise), that message could go on to inform how I reach out to people in hard times in future.
@goof@_alialkhatib@blprnt Stranger still, if they received informed consent from participants, why are they arguing to Business Insider that they're exempt from informed consent law? https://t.co/GjcaPm4uH6
@goof@_alialkhatib@blprnt The satisfaction scores dropped when the participants learned messages were composed by AI. If they were fully informed before, they'd already know about the AI copilot, so why the score drop?
@PatronSaint2@Kylez1967@lvgcommunities@UnitingChurchAu Hey @PatronSaint2 - just in case you were still looking for examples, here are 101 of them (the site just launched today). A national charter would mean every Australian could expect these kinds of protections:
https://t.co/8Yu6w5l72a
@JonWolfMueller@Real_Boaz @DorsaAmir @Asher_Wolf@dblplusgoodful Trade-off is that it's easier for me to find related work in semschol, and their "highly influenced" score is really useful. My general workflow, for now, is elicit -> semschol (generate list to review) -> scite (qualify + contextualize list items).
@JonWolfMueller@Real_Boaz @DorsaAmir @Asher_Wolf@dblplusgoodful@JonWolfMueller both are great, semschol is free while https://t.co/HMMZcG5h1C requires a monthly fee (reduced for academics). Key difference for me is that scite includes text extracts of the references, which helps me grok key areas of contribution/controversy before I read.
@troutish@peacenicsta I don't have the capacity/skills to help on the socials or content side. But if someone's happy to brief me in on the rough shape of the campaign, I could definitely help towards getting a site set up.
@Real_Boaz @DorsaAmir @Asher_Wolf@dblplusgoodful Also, the easy-to-use "export to .bib" function, means you can find the right question in elicit, export papers to .bib, map citation patterns using something like https://t.co/BRdGUtZpG9, and continue to add new nodes using https://t.co/y9PE1Ul6n0 or https://t.co/HMMZcG5h1C
@Real_Boaz @DorsaAmir @Asher_Wolf@dblplusgoodful This is fantastic - especially love that the search uses a plain text query, so you can hook it up to an Alfred custom search to make accessing it even easier.
@troutish @Graham_Caswell @ruxton I’d need to dig into Twitter’s API Terms of Service to see if they’d be cool with this, but the tech seems pretty do-able. Would be happy to contribute!