BITCOIN BEAR MARKET PATH PROJECTION — 2026
Aug 25–29
BTC Zone: $77K–$81K
→ End of the major August rally
→ Possible Penultimate / Major Bull Trap
Early September
BTC Zone: $68K–$62K
→ First major sell-off wave
→ Rally failure, bearish structure resumes
Mid September
BTC Zone: $60K–$52K
→ Deeper drawdown
→ Return into a deeper bear-market regime
Late September
BTC Zone: $48K–$43K
→ Accelerating weakness / rising fear
→ Approaching the final drawdown regime
Early October
BTC Zone: ~$39K–$42K
→ Possible local low before one final rally
→ Potential setup for the Final Bull Trap
~Oct 9–18
BTC Zone: ~$46K–$50K
→ Smaller +15% to +22% counter-trend rally
→ Possible Final Bull Trap
Following 7–16 days
BTC Zone: $50K → $35K
→ Final capitulation wave
→ Historical Final-Trap → Bottom structure
Oct 25, 2026
BTC Zone: ~$35K
→ Hypothetical Cycle Bottom
→ Independent Time-Model projection
SIMPLIFIED PROJECTION
$80–81K August Major Bull Trap
↓
$60K
↓
$50K
↓
~$40K Early October
↑
~$47–49K Final Bull Trap
↓
~$35K Cycle Bottom around Oct 25
Research projection only, not a prediction.
2026 remains the holdout.
#Btc #BtcBottom #BtcResearch
BITCOIN TRAP PROGRESSION?
Historical bear markets show an interesting late-cycle sequence:
2018
Penultimate bull trap: +23.1% → 61 days before bottom
Final bull trap: +22.2% → 16 days before bottom
2022
Penultimate bull trap: +22.4% → 69 days before bottom
Final bull trap: +18.0% → 16 days before bottom
2026
Current rally: roughly +27%
Rally high sits 61 days before our independently projected Oct 25 cycle-bottom date
If the historical progression rhymes, the August rally may have been the last major bull trap, but not necessarily the final one.
What would make this especially interesting:
If BTC sells off again, then produces another smaller ~15–22% counter-trend rally in October, followed by a new low roughly 1–2 weeks later, the historical trap progression would be reproduced remarkably closely.
#Btc #BtcBottom #BtcResearch
@DeFiMidas I agree on the bearish structure, but I think $50–55k is too high for the final bottom.
That zone may only be support on the way down.
My cycle-bottom zone remains $35k–$40k.
Interesting comparison. ASST may have the cleaner structure and more flexibility, but MSTR still has the scale, liquidity, track record and the much deeper capital-markets flywheel.
For me, the key question is not which one looks cleaner today, but which model can compound Bitcoin per share most effectively over multiple cycles.
ASST is a very interesting challenger.
MSTR is still the benchmark.
Grafik aslında yazıdan daha bearish görünüyor 🙂
Yazıda $57K “dip” deniyor ama grafikte gerçek cycle bottom bölgesi daha çok $45K–55K civarında çizilmiş.
Bence asıl önemli nokta fiyat hedefinden çok dip oluşum süreci. $57K’ya dokunmak tek başına cycle bottom olduğu anlamına gelmez. Önce piyasanın gerçek bir bottom formation sürecinden geçtiğini görmek lazım.
Bei einem BTC-Kurs um 40.000 $ halte ich einen MSTR-Kurs um 35 $ durchaus für möglich – besonders wenn das mNAV/Premium weiter komprimiert. Und der entscheidende Punkt: Der Bärenmarkt-Bottom wäre damit wahrscheinlich noch nicht einmal gebildet. Genau deshalb würde ich bei MSTR mit frühen Einstiegen vorsichtig sein.
I’d tell him not to rush.
If your goal is more upside with $MSTR, entry price matters even more because MSTR amplifies Bitcoin in both directions.
I’d rather wait for Bitcoin to form and confirm its bear-market bottom, then look at MSTR when fear and compression are highest.
The upside doesn’t disappear because you waited.
But buying a high-beta Bitcoin proxy before the BTC bottom can make the ride unnecessarily painful.
Price zone is plausible, but the timing looks way too late to me.
By April 2027, I’d expect Bitcoin to already be back in the early bull phase.
My current expectation is that the final bear-market bottom forms much earlier, around October 2026.
So I can see the $42K–$48K area as a possible capitulation zone, just not in April 2027.
Interessantes Timing-Muster.
Was mir dabei noch fehlt, ist die Marktmechanik. Ein historisches Zeitfenster kann uns sagen, wann wir besonders genau hinschauen sollten. Es sagt aber noch nicht, ob der Bottom-Prozess tatsächlich begonnen hat.
Genau deshalb trenne ich Timing und Bottom-Bestätigung voneinander.
Nach unserem aktuellen Stand ist der finale Bottom noch nicht bestätigt und liegt aus meiner Sicht weiterhin vor uns. Unsere unabhängigen Zeitmodelle verdichten das wahrscheinlichste Fenster derzeit eher auf Oktober als auf September.
Wenn dieses Zeitfenster dann zusätzlich mit Trend Compression, schwacher Closing-Struktur und zunehmendem Capitulation Pressure zusammenfällt, wird die Bottom-These deutlich belastbarer.
Die Zeit kann uns zum Fenster führen. Den Bottom muss der Markt selbst bestätigen.