For decades the American people were treated like children and told to just trust the process. That era is over.
This is the age of disclosure, and the truth belongs to you, not to a bureaucrat who stamped it classified 30 years ago.
🔴 REP. LUNA JUST CONFIRMED IT: FBI PROVES UAPs ARE REAL / INTERDIMENSIONAL NHI EXISTS! 👽🛸
In a bombshell interview with Brandon Tatum filmed mid-June 2026 (dropped June 22), Rep. Anna Paulina Luna stated: “The FBI was and is seriously looking into all this, and we can’t explain it. So the idea that the phenomena does not exist has been disproven. It does.”
Briefings describe them as interdimensional, advanced non-human intelligence operating beyond our physics.
Luna is simultaneously pushing whistleblower immunity for crash retrieval locations and total transparency on UAPs, Epstein files, and JFK.
Full disclosure may be closer than they want us to believe.
🚨BREAKING🚨: For decades, U.S. intelligence (namely, the CIA and Office of Naval Intelligence) has been quietly shaping what Hollywood tells the public about UFOs, hiding truths in plain sight. Bryce Zabel (@BryceZabel) and Brent Friedman (@BFree63), creators of the 1996 NBC alien-themed series Dark Skies, say a man claiming to be Naval Intelligence showed up at their own premiere party already knowing what was in their unaired pilot, and offered them a trade: classified access for guidance on their future scripts. Texas Chainsaw Massacre and Poltergeist Director Tobe Hooper told Brent that Steven Spielberg got the same offer after Jaws, took the deal, and went on to make Close Encounters and E.T.. Separately, Brent Friedman says his family friend John Herrington who later became Secretary of Energy (Head of the entire Department of Energy) told him privately after a few drinks that aliens are real and he’s seen them. Official attempts have been made to get Herrington (now 87) to testify about these claims, but he’s ignored them. Friedman himself also reports of having had an encounter with a “Nordic” alien being. This was one of the wildest episodes we’ve ever filmed. Live now.
Question: "Have you met with David Grusch and if so, what was your impression of him?"
My answer: "I actually had a Zoom call with him and I felt that he's very honest. You know, he truly believes what he says. And that's very intriguing. If he's correct, then we have a a learning curve, to figure out where where these visitors came from and and we are heading towards a very different future than our past..... It's really important that he's part of the disclosure effort because if he can point us in the right direction and and then we find that evidence then we will know more."
This is Marion Stokes. She was worried that people would one day rewrite and manipulate history, so she spent over 30 years recording TV broadcasts and preserved more than 70,000 VHS tapes of history.
I can only imagine how many UFO stories are buried inside those tapes.
The Phoenix Lights happened in 1997.
The O’Hare Airport UFO sighting happened in 2006.
Rendlesham Forest became one of the most famous military UFO cases ever discussed on television.
And countless smaller local UFO reports may have aired once, disappeared from public memory, and now exist only inside archives like hers.
Imagine the interviews, witness testimonies, old news segments, images, and videos that may still be sitting in that collection.
What other bombshell alien/UFO stories are buried in those tapes that the world might never see?
As addressed in @AlchemyAmerican's latest excellent podcast with @BFree63, the Office of Naval Intelligence (ONI) – the oldest intelligence agency of the United States – is the branch of America's military and intelligence community that Disclosure efforts should focus on.
🔥 DEBUNKER IN THE UAP WAR ROOM?
Ross Coulthart just issued a direct REALITY CHECK challenge to Michael Shermer, the longtime UFO skeptic just named “anomalies expert” on Avi Loeb’s new White House/AARO/ODNI-backed UAP Science Advisory Council.
Shermer spent years publicly ranking David Grusch among top pseudoscience figures and making pejorative comments (now deleted). He issued a public apology today after Coulthart called him out.
This appointment drops exactly as Trump ordered declassifications accelerate (Feb–June 2026 file dumps) and Grusch-level whistleblowers allege secret NHI craft retrievals and biologics.
Coulthart on X today: Come on NewsNation. Let’s see how objectively you approach this UAP investigation.
Genuine scientific balance… or controlled opposition while the biggest discovery in history hangs in the balance?
The community is watching. 🛸
BREAKING: 🚨‼️NEW - TWO NEW GATEKEEPERS HAVE BEEN UNMASKED
1. Deputy Director of DARPA, Peter Highnam
2. Ex Northrop Grumman, Commander Lee M. Russell, Deputy Maintenance Group Air National Guard ret.
They are nameless, faceless Sneaky Snakes no more.
This is only the beginning.
We are never going to stop.
We are never going away.
Disclosure now.
#ufotwitter#ufoX#UFOs#UAPs
Steven Spielberg’s DISCLOSURE DAY has now grossed over $160M worldwide and is tracking toward a $250–280M finish.
The film carries a reported $115M production budget. 🎬👽
Lue Elizondo says aliens have been on the Moon.🧐🤔👽👽👽👽👽👽👽
In a new interview with Liberation Times, Elizondo claims NHI have either visited or may currently be on the Moon.
Ross Coulthart Calls for James Lacatski to Testify Under Oath About His Alleged Entry Into a Craft
*Government/Military
During a recent Reality Check Q&A published by NewsNation, investigative journalist Ross Coulthart called on former Pentagon UAP program manager Dr. James Lacatski to testify under oath before Congress about what Coulthart described as Lacatski having gone inside a craft.
The comment came during a discussion about recent disclosures by former intelligence official David Grusch and whether the Department of Defense may now be allowing certain individuals to speak more openly about classified UAP matters.
Coulthart said he had been surprised not only by the additional information Grusch has recently been permitted to discuss, but also by Lacatski speaking publicly about having entered a craft.
He then said Lacatski should voluntarily appear before Congress and provide evidence under oath in the same way Grusch did during his 2023 congressional testimony.
Lacatski is not an ordinary commentator within the UAP debate. He previously worked for the Defense Intelligence Agency and helped initiate and manage the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program, commonly known as AAWSAP.
AAWSAP was a Pentagon funded program that examined unidentified aerial phenomena, unusual aerospace reports, alleged biological effects, advanced propulsion concepts, and other subjects considered relevant to future defense capabilities.
Because of that background, any claim involving Lacatski and direct access to an unusual craft carries substantially greater significance than an account from someone with no documented connection to government UAP investigations.
However, Coulthart’s wording in this clip is stronger than the more cautious public formulation commonly associated with Lacatski.
The previously reported claim is that the United States possesses a craft of unknown origin and successfully gained access to its interior. That statement does not necessarily establish that Lacatski personally entered the object.
Coulthart, by contrast, explicitly describes Lacatski as having spoken publicly about going inside a craft.
The distinction matters.
If Lacatski personally entered the object, he could potentially provide direct witness testimony about its dimensions, internal structure, materials, controls, propulsion system, instrumentation, and any features that appeared inconsistent with known human technology.
If he did not personally enter it, Congress would need to determine whether he was shown documents, photographs, technical reports, or testimony from other personnel who reportedly had access to the interior.
A sworn hearing could clarify exactly what Lacatski witnessed directly and what information he received from other sources.
It could also establish when the alleged access occurred, which agency or contractor controlled the object, whether AAWSAP had any formal connection to it, and whether congressional oversight committees were informed.
Another important question would be how the object was classified as a craft of unknown origin.
Unknown origin does not automatically mean extraterrestrial or nonhuman.
The description could theoretically involve highly classified American technology, a foreign aerospace system, a misidentified conventional object, incomplete intelligence, or a vehicle whose manufacturer and purpose were not disclosed to those discussing it.
Evidence would be required to distinguish among those possibilities.
Claims associated with the object have included descriptions of an apparently aerodynamic vehicle without conventional wings, engine components, air intakes, exhaust systems, fuel tanks, or an identifiable fuel source.
If independently confirmed, those features would raise major questions about how the craft generated lift, propulsion, control, and energy.
However, no vehicle, complete engineering record, material sample, internal photograph, or independently testable technical data has been released publicly.
This is why Coulthart’s call for congressional testimony is important.
Statements made in interviews or cleared publications can introduce significant allegations, but testimony under oath would allow lawmakers to ask direct follow up questions and establish a formal public record.
Congress could request program records, contractor agreements, access logs, internal reports, photographs, material analyses, and the names of personnel who allegedly inspected the object.
Lawmakers could also ask whether the Department of Defense reviewed Lacatski’s previous statements before publication and what that review actually established.
A government prepublication review generally determines whether information can be released without exposing protected classified material. It does not necessarily confirm that every statement is factually correct.
Lacatski’s credentials and documented involvement in a Pentagon UAP program make his reported statements important, but credentials alone cannot establish the physical existence or origin of the alleged craft.
The central question is therefore whether Lacatski personally entered an unusual vehicle and, if so, what evidence exists to support his account.
Coulthart is calling for that question to be addressed through sworn testimony rather than another media appearance.
Such testimony would not automatically prove that the object was extraterrestrial or connected to nonhuman intelligence. It could, however, clarify whether Lacatski was a direct witness, a program official briefed by others, or someone referring to information that remains several steps removed from the physical object.
Until that distinction is resolved, the claim remains highly consequential but publicly unverified.
documental inédito de Oliver Tree sobre la Antártida se filtró en línea…
Hay afirmaciones de que pasó 300 días allí investigando UAP y supuestas bases alienígenas.
La proyección privada salió a la luz 2 semanas antes del fatal accidente.
La película nunca se lanzó oficialmente, pero la especulación en torno a su muerte está desbocada.
D.E.P. Oliver Tree
🚨 Spielberg’s new film *Disclosure Day* features a character, Noah Scanlon, who bears a striking resemblance to Glenn Gaffney right down to the grey beard, hair, and intense vibe. The side-by-side comparison in the clip has fans asking if the director drew from real UAP insiders.
The movie already weaves in authentic lore like Roswell recoveries, reverse engineering, and crash retrieval programs. This visual parallel suggests Spielberg may have deeper insight into the players and history than many assumed.
Such nods keep the conversation alive as real disclosures continue to surface.