@TomaszFili59073@SlawomirMentzen Warto rozrozniac zatem prawo od faktow. Wyraznie w poscie jest napisane ze brak bylo pelnej wiedzy co do faktow bo byly ukrywane przed spoleczenstwem. Warto pamietac ze pis wtedy zapewnial ze to oni zwiekszaja nasze bezpieczenstwo.
@Lviv_UA_SU Sure, it's just logistics. Poland continues to supply weapons, including missiles for Patriots, pays for Starlink, provides fuel for your army, and does many other things. Not to mention the fact that everything you get from the EU, you get from EU member states.
@UlianSNikolaiev@ukasz74487784@khatsanovsky We didn't help completely for free, as we were supposed to receive some of the money back from the EU. However, it was clear from the outset that this would be a very small portion of what all countries contributed, so I guess gratitude is still due. The EU didn't have to help.
@leonidragozin Very decisive words. The problem, however, is that Poland doesn't intend to attack Ukraine, but it has a whole range of means to hinder its functioning after the war. Therefore, Ukraine should consider whether a conflict with Poland is actually worthwhile.
@SyrahQuaffer@yarotrof I understand that insulting the president of another country is something normal for people like you, but I am withdrawing from further discussion because it is already embarrassing.
@SyrahQuaffer@yarotrof How are we harming Ukraine? We took away the president's medal after he deliberately brought up a topic that was supposed to wait until the end of the war, and at the same time, we handed over our Patriots. You can be non-nationalist and still support your country in a dispute.
@SyrahQuaffer@yarotrof I have nothing against it, especially since the world's contempt is slowly turning towards Ukraine, and only insignificant people like you show contempt for Poland.
@SyrahQuaffer@yarotrof Well, it's our right to assess what's in our national interest. Ukraine has been emphasizing this for the past two weeks. NATO is currently not as credible, and the discussion concerns missiles, which even NATO lacks, so it poses a real risk to us.
@SyrahQuaffer@yarotrof Yes, we are such nationalists that only now, with Ukraine's aggressive gestures, have we begun to wonder if we haven't been supporting Ukraine at the expense of our own security, which is probably true. Perhaps we've confused how nationalism works.
@PetrenkoAndryi So if we want to produce weapons domestically, and even wanted to do so earlier than Ukraine, then we're the bad guys? Why? Because we don't want to give up our place in line to our poor neighbors?
@tarasmi@vladolf_futin You can of course pretend that all the previous aid and equipment provided for free is no longer important, but for people of common sense it is obvious that a country that has already received so much aid could, for a change, share something valuable with those who help it.
@tarasmi You can of course pretend that all the previous aid and equipment provided for free is no longer important, but for people of common sense it is obvious that a country that has already received so much aid could, for a change, share something valuable with those who help it.
@tarasmi In the winter of 2025/26, Poland (and two other countries) provided the SZU with a total of several dozen PAC-3MSE missiles, which defended Kyiv in December and January. It's a shame this fact isn't being brought up in Ukraine.
@TaHtoTyTakyi@Piotr64930487@Tsuroerusu The source is statements by Polish government politicians. If they are untrue, Ukrainian politicians should deny them. They are not doing so.
@_ryn_ka@PolokPa@Tsuroerusu The source is statements by Polish government politicians. If they are untrue, Ukrainian politicians should deny them. They are not doing so. Furthermore, it is unknown what portion of the technology was supposed to be covered by the agreement.
@belegost4@PolokPa@Tsuroerusu The source is statements by Polish government politicians. If they are untrue, Ukrainian politicians should deny them. They are not doing so. Furthermore, it is unknown what portion of the technology was supposed to be covered by the agreement.
@pwk The problem is that Ukraine knows it can gain the most now that others are supporting it bc of war, and what's more, it knows that after the war it will have internal problems. That's why they're trying to resolve all the outstanding issues now.