These are all of my official accounts. Not here, not me. DMs/emails are open.
X, YouTube: @D3SGER
Discord: doom3sger
Email: [email protected]
.is: DoomThreeKoala
BP Club: DoomThreeShotgunner
@reddit_lies Exactly.
"Muh McJob wages!" shut up. It's not meant to be something to live off of. It's something to pay your bills while you study/are looking for a better job.
@Tyr808@reddit_lies because they are perpetual victims living in a world where the PaTrIaRcHy and mens sole purpose is to make women's lives as bad as possible. I mean shit they called air-conditioning on the office misogynistic.
Feminism has so successfully monopolized academia (esp social sciences) that even moderately feminist academics sometimes feel compelled to (reluctantly) fact check the more extremist feminist academics when the latter attempts to promote anti-science.
Here's an example:
Feminists are trying to erase the scientific evidence that in ancient societies the hunters were mostly male, the gatherers were mostly female.
So other academics (who are also feminists, but more grounded in science than the first group) have released a counter study fact-checking the earlier anti-science study:
Female foragers sometimes hunt, yet gendered divisions of labor are real: a comment on Anderson et al. (2023) The Myth of Man the Hunter
https://t.co/Szziz0kZ4C
I recommend people read that link's whole page, but here's a quick summary:
It's a study by feminist anthropologists who reluctantly fact-check other feminist anthropologists who tried to push the misconception that women did as much or more hunting than men. This misconception was made possible by feminists selectively ignoring the enormous body of scientific evidence that shows a different reality that most feminists don't want to admit.
The reality:
Women did some hunting, but not at much as men.
Men did some gathering, but not as much as women.