Arab from Arabia.
Jew from Judea.
So how exactly did the Jews become the โoccupiersโ of Judeaโฆ
while the Arabs became the โindigenous Palestiniansโ?
Wordle 1,843 X/6*
โฌ๐จโฌโฌโฌ
โฌโฌโฌโฌ๐จ
โฌ๐ฉโฌ๐จ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉโฌโฌ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉโฌโฌ๐ฉ
๐ฉ๐ฉโฌโฌ๐ฉ@_cuddlefish_
One of those wordsโฆ
Important Update
Israel's Channel 14, a conservative television network often compared to Fox News in the United States, has reported that the newly appointed Director of the Israel Security Agency (Shin Bet), Maj. Gen. David Zini, wants to open an investigation into the alleged leak of the timing of the joint U.S.-Israeli military operation against Iran.
According to the report, the head of the Shin Bet's Investigations Division, who was appointed by the previous Shin Bet director, Ronen Bar, shortly before leaving office, and the agency's legal adviser have allegedly refused to cooperate with the proposed investigation. Channel 14's senior political commentator, Yaakov Bardugo, further reported that sources close to Director Zini claim that Israel's Attorney General, Gali Baharav-Miara, is blocking the investigation.
For American readers, it is important to understand the institutional context. Unlike the U.S. Attorney General, Israel's Attorney General is not a political appointee who serves at the pleasure of the elected government. The office is held by a career legal official who exercises broad independent authority over criminal investigations and government legal policy. This institutional structure has been at the center of Israel's constitutional and political debates in recent years.
If the Channel 14 reports are accurate, the implications extend far beyond Israeli domestic politics. The alleged leak concerns the timing of one of the most consequential military operations jointly undertaken by Israel and the United States in recent years. Any unauthorized disclosure of operational timing could have endangered not only Israeli pilots and soldiers but also American personnel and broader allied strategic interests.
According to Bardugo, one of the leading presenters on Israel's Channel 12 reportedly stated that "half the country knew" when the operation would begin. If that statement accurately reflects reality, it raises obvious questions about the existence of a significant operational leak. Whether those questions are ultimately substantiated is precisely what a professional investigation would be expected to determine.
The decision regarding when to launch military action against Iran was among the most consequential national security decisions made by the United States and Israel. Had operational details reached Iranian intelligence before the operation commenced, the consequences could have included loss of American and Israeli lives, damage to strategic deterrence, and broader geopolitical consequences affecting U.S. interests in the Middle East and beyond.
For that reason, it is difficult to argue against the basic proposition that any credible allegation of such a leak deserves a thorough, professional, and independent investigation.
Given the exceptionally close intelligence relationship between the United States and Israel, it is reasonable to assume that American intelligence agencies maintain close liaison relationships with their Israeli counterparts. If reports that an investigation is being blocked are accurate, I believe American officials should seek clarification from their Israeli counterparts regarding whether the matter is being appropriately investigated, particularly if American operational interests may have been placed at risk.
Separately, I note that approximately 100,000 Israelis have signed a public petition calling on President Donald Trump to impose sanctions on Attorney General Gali Baharav-Miara and Israeli Supreme Court President Yitzhak Amit. The petition reflects the view of its supporters that Israel's legal system has become excessively powerful and politically partisan. These allegations remain the subject of intense political controversy within Israel.
In addition, congressional oversight efforts concerning U.S. funding connected to Israeli protest organizations remain ongoing. Among the issues reportedly under review are whether U.S. federal funds were used in ways inconsistent with their intended purposes and whether any related legal or tax violations occurred. Those inquiries have not yet reached final conclusions.
Israel and the United States stand together in defending shared democratic values and common security interests. Precisely because of that partnership, any allegation involving a potential compromise of sensitive operational information affecting both countries deserves careful scrutiny, wherever the facts ultimately lead.