@johnplaysbass11@BarronTNews_ There are so many failing grade humans around, why Elon? Nothing good his companies do is accounted to him. What companies do - is one thing, what he does, is another, right? He decided to share with company workers instead of you. Complete failure of a human being.
@Geoffrey_Stertz@AIDRIVR Nothing terrible about it. This stupid AI never tried to avoid the accident. Normal human drivers don't just assume they have the right or priority, they actually trying to not get into accident. AI should be even more vigilant to be considered better than human. This one is not.
@TVgTMSBejrOraq4@watarufunaki There is no one entity representing "autonomous driving". Some technologies can get you very far today (FSD), while others are a far cry from being "autonomous".
@ATarnut@kimmonismus It's all hype. Just as you said, they hallucinate no worse than LLMs. 11 years ago Demis said we will cure all diseases in 10 years. Pure hallucination.
@kimmonismus Right. Just a reminder: he is the guy who said "In 10 years we will cure every disease". And he said that 11 years ago.
You see the most serious scientist, I see a broken clock.
Stop wasting words. Deliver.
@tigerloose1@ElonogyX You extract materials like you do out of ground. Difference is you'll get fraction of 1% by digging, while the battery is a 99% usable elements. Extracting from old battery is far cheaper than from the ground.
@wholemars Still, 4 out of 10 replaced Tesla with something else. People are strong at inflicting self damage or there are cars which they perceive as "better"?
@dalsault@elonmusk I can count backwards no problem. Intelligence is not to follow strict definitions (this is just heuristics), it's to read and understand intentions. For example, the original post's intention is to show how other model is bad while grok good.
@whimsicalellen@KatieMiller@grok p3. Not sure I was able to explain clearly, sorry about that. Anyway, the point is, while scapegoating does exist, it's counter-productive to loosely label someone's position as scapegoating. Stick to the ground truth, and once cards are open you might not even need to put labels
@whimsicalellen@KatieMiller@grok p2. so you might call it scapegoating to side with the "victim". Considering "scapegoating" is just a label, your action could be labeled as a "reverse-scapegoating", meaning you side with the "victim" because it's in people's nature to root for underdog sometimes...