Damar Ilham

dr. | Dzikir, Fikir, Amal Soleh | #KTBFFH

[Chino @ChinoUTD]

🚨 Jamie Carragher on Gabriel’s challenge on Martinez :

🗣️ Carragher: “This is why I sometimes laugh when people say refereeing decisions even themselves out over a season.

Look at this one. Gabriel goes for the ball, absolutely. I don’t think anybody is saying he wakes up this morning planning to kick the goalkeeper in the head.

But how many times do we see somebody get sent off and afterwards they’re saying, ‘I was going for the ball’? Of course you were. Most players who get sent off for these red card challenges are trying to win the ball. That doesn’t suddenly make the challenge safe.

Once you miss it and your boot ends up in the goalkeeper’s face, the question becomes whether you’ve endangered an opponent. That’s what VAR has to seriously look at.

Because if they look at it and decide it’s serious foul play, Gabriel is sent off. Arsenal are playing practically the entire match with ten men.

Instead there’s no card and we’re playing on.

That’s not a little decision.

People will analyse the game afterwards and talk about possession, chances, substitutions, who played well. But you’re potentially talking about two completely different football matches depending on how one referee interprets five seconds.

And that’s where the inconsistency frustrates people. Chelsea supporters will remember another challenge that was reviewed and punished. Arsenal supporters will find another one that wasn’t.

I’m less interested in which fanbase can produce the better compilation.

I just want to know what the rule is.

Because if this is considered a normal attempt to play the ball, fine. Tell everybody.

Goalkeepers might want to wear helmets, but at least we’ll have consistency.”

[Premier League Match Centre (Parody) @PL_Match_Centre]

#ARSCHE - 7”

Someone kicks Emi Martinez in the head in a penalty box melee.

Disgusting!

Oh wait, it’s Gabriel - Play on!

[Ali 👊🏻 @mhuseinali]

Ini anak perempuan, abangnya meninggal karena nolong dia. Bapaknya digosipkan selingkuh. Ibunya menceraikan ayahnya.

Engga gila aja udah bagus banget jir.

Islam tidak mengajarkan kita menghakimi trauma orang lain.

Let her find her own peace 🙏🏻

[Daniel Haqiqatjou @Haqiqatjou]

Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab takfired the entire Ottoman empire, called Ottoman Muslims "mushriks" worse than the Quraysh, and launched "jihads" against them, where he killed them in their mosques, homes, and marketplaces.

For this reason, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab was condemned as a Khariiji-like heretic by all the scholars of his era (e.g., Ibn Afaliq, Ibn Abidin, al-Sawi, the Ottoman Shaykh al-Islam) .

In fact, no one considered his followers mainstream Sunni Muslims until the early 20th century, when the Saudi state of Najd annexed the Hijaz and forced Wahhabi scholars to tone down their teachings on takfir.

It is this reason why Wahhabism has a bad name.

Admittedly the term "Wahhabism" does have a connection with Allah and the Quran. But so do the terms "Hezbollah", "al-Ikhwan al-Muslimin", "Ayatullah", and "Islamic State (ISIS)". Yet few Muslims, particularly the followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab, hold that such names cannot be used as insults. Indeed, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's followers regularly insult groups associated with these names.

Admittedly, some Muslims use the term Wahhabism as an insult for those who defend proper tawhid. But most Muslims do not. Rather they insult Wahhabis for holding heretical and/or inconsistent views on a variety of issues.

Hence, Wahhabis are criticized for

- mass takfiring and killing other Muslims
-allying with non-Muslims to kill other Muslims after mass takfiring them (e.g., allying with the British against the Ottomans in WWI and allying with the US against Iraq).
-defending the stance of Ibn Taymiyya that it is acceptable to believe that hell is not eternal
-defending the view of Ibn Taymiyya that the world has existed alongside Allah for eternity
-defending the view of Ibn Taymiyya that it is permissible to call on jinns for protection and aid
-defending the view of Ibn Taymiyya that the Prophet ﷺ was temporarily tricked by Satan into preaching shirk (qissa al-gharaniq)

To be sure, Ibn Taymiyya is a great and respectable scholar. But the problem with Wahhabis is that they often assume his infallibility, and do not give sufficient respect to other great Sunni scholars like al-Tabari, al-Ghazali, and al-Nawawi. Indeed, Wahhabis demand tolerance or acceptance of Ibn Taymiyya's problematic views, while exhibiting zero tolerance for the views of other scholars, which reflects a type of chauvinism.

Contrary to what is claimed by Ibn Abd al-Wahhab's followers, many Muslims who never practice tawassul, istiighatha, or mawlid (like myself) oppose Wahhabis over their many other deviations, which sometimes rise to the level of kufr and merit strong criticism.

As for the term "Salafi", it was not used by the Salaf themselves or medieval Sunnis to denote the notion of following the Salaf. All Sunni groups have always believed in following the Salaf, so they did not need the label "Salafi" to mark themselves as holders of this position. This is why they all followed madhhabs established by members of the Salaf (Abu Hanifa, Malik, Shafii, Ibn Hanbal). At most, sometimes the term Salaf was used to denote the aqida of the Hanbalis/Ahl al-Hadith as opposed to that of other groups like Asharites and Maturidites.

The notion of "Salafi" as meaning following the Salaf was created in the early twentieth century by the modernist reformers Abduh and Rashid Rida, before being picked up by al-Albani and other scholars in Saudi Arabia in the middle of the twentieth century. They then started calling themselves "Salafi", as opposed to earlier terms like "followers of the Najdi/Wahhabi dawah".

Use of the term Salafi raises certain concerns. Those who use it today do not know its history. Moreover, the followers of Ibn Abd al-Wahhab use the term to falsely claim that, opposed to other Sunnis, only they follow the Salaf. This is a misrepresentation of Sunni views, and distorts Sunni history.

Beyond this, due to the influence of Abduh and Rida, contemporary "Salafis" regularly mock the beliefs and practices found among the actual Salaf, such as the notion that there continue to be a class of miracle working saints in all eras, that there exists forces of baraka, and that knowledge of the supernatural does not only come from scripture but also from direct interactions with supernatural forces (e.g., in dreams, waking visions, jinn possession incidents). And this is not even to mention the practice of tawassul which was endorsed by some major figures from the Salaf like Ibn Hanbal. "Salafis" make the bizarre claim that the actual beliefs and practices of the Salaf are later "Sufi" accretions which have nothing to do with Islam. In reality, Abduh and Rida rejected these beliefs and practices as non-scientific superstitions (khurafat), because they were modernizing reformists, and then their ideas were picked up by later "Salafis".

This is not to say that all Salafis are bad. In fact on the whole, many Salafis are quite good. These are the Salafis who are heavily influenced by Ibn Hanbal and Ibn Taymiyya (who never claimed to be infallible). But as for the "Salafis' who follow Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and Rida and Fawzan, then their views merit criticism.

[Djidi Dewa @DjidiDewa]

Mengkritik Shahih Bukhari itu ada ilmunya. Ulama yg berhak mengkritik Bukhari itu levelnya hrs sekelas Al Hafizh Ad Daraquthni (penghafal ratusan ribu hadis bersanad)
​Kalau peneliti otodidak tanpa guru talaqqi memberanikan diri melemahkan hadis Bukhari itu berani tanpa otoritas

[A. Ainur Rohman @ainurohman]

Main2 pulpen saat rapat dengan kepala negara jelas akan ditafsirkan sbg kebosanan, ketidakpedulian, sikap menyepelekan, nggak respek.

Si karbitan ini apa nggak ngeh kalau dlm dunia diplomasi, setiap gerak-gerik delegasi dipantau dan dianggap membawa pesan dan makna.

Apalagi ini sama Putin..

[jakartalk @Jakartalk]

Sekelompok orang melakukan eksperimen pada goa terdalam di bumi, goa veryovkina di Georgia, dengan melemparkan bongkahan batu besar ke dasar goa.

Suara gema aneh (seperti teriakan manusia) yg dihasilkan ketika batu menghantam permukaan membuat mereka semua panik.

Sound on 🎧

[Nusantara @tiidurpagi]

suporter bola lokal hampir ga ada yg melek politik. kerjaannya invasif, rasis, mentingin kelompok sendiri.

[471TO @TOzgokmen]

It took Venezuela 1 hour to lose the war and 8 months to lose ALL THEIR OIL.

Now you know why Iran has been preparing for this war for decades.

They knew BIG OIL would come knocking on their door after Iraq, Libya & certainly Venezuela...

[aerobit @recehsjaa]

Ini beneran Pemerintahan Kalimantan tengah melepas unit pemadam pake seremonial begini??

Lahan udah habis kebakaran, ini masih main perayaan pemberangkatan.

DAGELANN DAGELANNN

[Soviet Wan Khruschenovi @Zoroastriancrab]

Que exista una entidad fascista de blancos larpeando de judíos que oprimen a judíos de verdad y que a todos los blancos del resto del mundo les parezca bien se me sigue haciendo tan jodidamente irreal

[Junior🏴‍☠️ @jforreal04]

Le fait qu’on ait tous pensé au même joueur mdrr

[Jürgenholic Indonesia @thejurgenholic]

______ ______ ______ ______ ______ ______
← ⚪ Julian Alvarez (IM3) ⠇

¹ ᵐⁱⁿᵘᵗᵉ ᵃᵍᵒ

[mars (he/him) 🇵🇸 | SAW CONAN GRAY @artistichaao]

the concept of 8 yo mamdani being responsible for 9/11

[Bashar Zapen @BasharZapen]

Germans will look you in the face and tell you there's no genocide in Gaza because Israel hasn't made industrialised concentration camps.

Then Israeli ministers advertise this:

[FPL Marcin @FPLMarcin]

Bruno captainers to Haaland captainers today

[Emzel @Emzyl_]

United still have players in their team from the Obama administration