@HalfAlive765702@darwintojesus Wasting more time arguing about something you don't believe, knowing that any believe system is futile in a universe that eventually will disappear. No matter what you accomplish in life everything will be gone. Unless you are a believer, angry at God's law.
@Ernest1588761 So atheists try to find injustice in the Bible to prove what exactly?
Don't your realize atheism means that everything is meaningless? So injustice does not really exists. At the end the sun will implode and nothing will matter, every massacre every smile are all the same.
@Aiism_Priest Jesus is a real person not some mythical figure... there is more history on Him than even the Caesar or every other historical figure of that time. I can tell you are living a fantasy provided by the 1800s atheists that got debunked by the death sea Scrolls.
Un grupo de religiosas católicas que dedica su vida al cuidado amoroso de pacientes terminales de cáncer en Nueva York se encuentra librando una dura batalla legal en defensa de su libertad religiosa y la fidelidad a la doctrina de la Iglesia. Las monjas enfrentan una severa regulación estatal sobre identidad de género que colisiona directamente con la fe y la moral católica.
Las normativas impuestas por la administración local exigen la adopción de directrices que contradicen la antropología cristiana y la ley natural. De negarse a acatar estos mandatos en sus centros de atención, las comunidades religiosas podrían enfrentar severas sanciones económicas de hasta 10.000 dólares y penas de hasta un año de prisión para las responsables.
A pesar de las amenazas jurídicas y las presiones institucionales, las religiosas se mantienen firmes en su labor caritativa y en su compromiso con la verdad evangélica. Para la Iglesia, este caso representa un alarmante precedente de persecución administrativa contra aquellas instituciones que solo buscan servir a los más vulnerables sin traicionar sus convicciones sagradas.
Diversas organizaciones de defensa legal y comunidades eclesiales se han solidarizado con estas valientes mujeres, consideradas verdaderas heroínas de la fe en la sociedad contemporánea. Se ha iniciado una intensa cadena de oración a nivel internacional para pedir por el cese de estas hostilidades legales y para que las religiosas puedan continuar su misión hospitalaria en paz y con absoluta libertad.
@Aiism_Priest@darwintojesus Last message I promise, because of you I just had the best read of a saint I didn't know existed... Saint Wenceslaus, You have a rich heritage within Christianity. (If you aren't using a VPN that is).
@LarsTheBadMan@NotEvolution1 Why are so many atheist preachers... gentle reminder that you belive life is meaningless and random, what other people think should not be a concern to you, at the end the sun will implode and everything will be for nothing.. remember you faith in nothingness.
@Aiism_Priest@darwintojesus Sad that Christ destroyed your superstitions and false gods... goooood. Now you have to be smart and understand why they converted.
On June 20, 2026, in Thessaloniki, Greece, a man wearing Orthodox monastic robes layin the street in front of a Pride parade float, holding a wooden cross decorated with an icon of the Theotokos.
Based!
Evolution cannot create new things.
I say it all the time.
It really makes evolutionists angry.
“We've directly observed evolution creating new things! It's a known fact!!”
But has anyone actually ever seen evolution creating new things?
Let's go back in evolutionary time - back to the alleged first lifeform, the ancestor of us all: LUCA.
LUCA is just a simple single celled organism.
No arms or legs, no organs, nothing but a single self replicating cell, filled with a few simple organelles and just a bit of DNA.
This simple lifeform supposedly evolved into all the diversity of life we see - humans, apes, fish, birds, bees, trees, bananas, bacteria - all of it.
Which means LUCA had to figure out how to build all those complex new parts (without intelligence).
This is what it means that evolution has to build new things.
At one point, bones didn't exist.
Evolution had to create bone cells from non-bone cells by mutating non-bone cell stuff one step at a time.
And then organize bone cells together into actual bones.
This requires at least thousands, or probably tens of thousands of lines of new DNA code.
Evolutionists say certain DNA segments get copied, which are then free to mutate until they miraculously find something useful.
Nevermind the impossible odds…
This has simply never been observed.
The best examples they can muster are simple variations of already existing structures.
Analogy...
Imagine you have a hammer that you've always used for hammering nails.
Then one day you discover that you can use the forked side to pull nails up!
Wow! A new feature was discovered!
…Did you create anything new?
No. You simply discovered a new feature you didn't know existed before.
But it was always there.
This is what we see when we observe evolution.
We see minor variation or tweaking of what's already there.
We don't see anything new being built.
That is a fundamental failure of the theory of evolution.
Scientists have even tried to force mutations in the lab to build new things.
They've intelligently guided experiments towards that end.
They've failed.
Not completely - they've certainly showed interesting adaptive behavior within genetics.
But there is a certain point in all mutation experiments where the system simply fails.
Too many mutations, or even a single mutation in the wrong spot, kills the system every time.
The reality is, there is a limit to how much a system can be mutated before catastrophic failure.
You can use a hammer to drive in the nail or pull it out.
But you'll never turn a hammer into a table saw.
Evolution is an adaptive mechanism.
Evolution cannot build new things.
Only intelligence can do that.