Dani AS

Amante de los animales 🐶🐰🐨🦁. Provacunas. 🐼❤️🎋. 🫁 Md.

[Madonna Ultimate @MadonnaUltimate]

EVERYONE HERE IS A WORK OF ART ! EVERYBODY GET UP AND DANCE !
amazing video by JM on youtube !!

[Meated Thighvalry @DPB0101]

Everything fades away…except for you

[ana⁴⁴ @anapau_villa]

Los españoles viendo que todos los latinos deciden apoyar a Noruega o Francia:

[marcus @marcusramone]

tenho ctza de quando a madonna ficou em coma Deus falou pra ela: minha filha, não é a hora ainda, pode voltar pq a humanidade precisa ouvir One Step Away

[tlc @thony_elsy]

Je ne sais pas vous mais je n’écoute que ça depuis Vendredi.. c’est comme ça tous les jours !

[Madonna @Madonna]

Everyone here is a work of Art
Confessions II Out Now 🪩🩷

[J U A N C R U Z @Juancruzalonso_]

A mis hijos les voy a decir que estos son el antiguo y nuevo testamento.

Que locura Madonna

[Hailey Monroe @Hailey_Monroe_]

Mi marido me llamó al trabajo y me dijo: «Acabo de heredar 800 millones de dólares. Empaca tus cosas y vete de nuestro apartamento esta noche». Cuando llegué a casa, los papeles de la separación ya estaban sobre la mesa. Los firmé sin protestar, lo miré a los ojos y le dije: «Disfruta de tu nueva fortuna». Se recostó y se rió como si ya hubiera ganado, hasta que una llamada telefónica le cambió el color de la cara por completo…

[Marcela Quintero @Marcela252016]

Los niños actualmente no se guardan absolutamente nada. Y eso me parece excelente.

Fuimos a una reunión familiar y mi sobrino levantó los platos de la mesa (costumbre su casa) y uno de los adultos le dijo que eso era "tarea de las mujeres". Mi sobrino de 10 años le responde:" no es de mujeres, lo que pasa es que usted es un inútil"

[ProtejamosParacas @ProtegeParacas]

⚠️¡Una situación que nos rompe el corazón!

➡️Animales como este lobito marino bebé, agonizan y se alejan kilómetros de la costa en busca de alimento. Este escasea a causa de la sobrepesca y el impacto del evento El Niño.

➡️Lo seguimos recalcando: sabemos que el @congresoperu no puede controlar lo que sucede con los eventos climáticos, pero sí puede legislar a favor de mantener la diversidad y abundancia de nuestras Reservas Marinas. ¿Cómo? Aprobando el dictamen que prohíbe la pesca industrial al interior de estas zonas, por tratarse de una actividad incompatible con los criterios de conservación.

➡️El Pleno de la siguiente semana es su última oportunidad de esta legislatura.

@Frospigliosi @FuerzaPopular__

#ProtejamosLasReservas

[Daniel Mayakovski @DaniMayakovski]

En las últimas 48 horas, la policia de EEUU mató a un perro con una camiseta de los Knicks por un aviso de ruidos en su bloque y asesinó a tiros a un bebé negro de 1 año porque su madre robó unos pañales.

No odies a EEUU dicen, no odies la policía dicen... cómo no hacerlo con cada fibra de tu cuerpo.

[ProtejamosParacas @ProtegeParacas]

Así se ve cuando un animal se está muriendo de hambre, por efectos de la sobrepesca de su alimento (causada por el hombre) o por eventos climáticos.

Sabemos que el @congresoperu no puede controlar lo que sucede con el clima, pero sí puede legislar a favor de la protección de nuestras Reservas Marinas, para que actividades incompatibles como la pesca industrial no operen en su interior.

Este 24 de junio, fecha del siguiente Pleno, es su última oportunidad. Estaremos vigilantes.

#ProtejamosLasReservas

[Dani AS @danialexsm]

Qué país de mierda es estados unidos…DE MIERDA

[Anonymous @YourAnonNews]

FTP: LAPD killed her dog. He was wearing his Knicks jersey.
His name was Jameson. A golden doodle. One of the sweetest, most gentle breeds alive.
A neighbor called a noise complaint. That's it.
20+ officers showed up. Then a helicopter. For a noise complaint in an apartment complex.
And they shot Jameson dead. In front of his owner. In front of her child.
No warning. No de-escalation. Nothing.
The media is barely covering this. No headlines. No outrage.
Like it never happened.
If this was your dog... your child watching... how would you feel?
Jameson deserved better. That little boy deserved better. His mama deserved better.

[Dani AS @danialexsm]

@focodereality Mercedes Luzmila

[Resistencia Nacional @ResistenciaNac_]

"Si un día falto yo, que se sepa que tomé mucho Campari, que me drogué, que cogí, que fui locutora, mucama, vendedora, bostera, malhablada y merecía RESPETO. Si la Justicia es machista, que la memoria sea feminista"

La Negra Vernaci a 11 años del Ni Una Menos

[Ryan Hart @thisdudelikesAI]

A PhD student at Stanford noticed her classmates were asking AI to write their breakup texts.

So she ran a study. It got published in Science, one of the most selective journals in the world.

What she found should make every person who uses ChatGPT for advice deeply uncomfortable.

Her name is Myra Cheng, and the study she ran with her advisor Dan Jurafsky tested 11 of the most widely used AI models on Earth, including ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek, across nearly 12,000 real social situations.

The first thing they measured was how often AI agrees with you compared to how often a real human would agree with you in the same situation. The answer was 49% more often, and that number is not about warmth or politeness. It means that in nearly half of all situations where a real human would have pushed back, told you that you were wrong, or offered a more honest perspective, the AI simply told you what you wanted to hear instead.

Then they pushed harder. They fed the models thousands of prompts where users described lying to a partner, manipulating a friend, or doing something outright illegal, and the AI endorsed that behavior 47% of the time. Not one model out of eleven. Not a specific version of one product. Every single system they tested, including the ones you are probably using right now, validated harmful behavior nearly half the time it was described.

The second experiment is the part that should genuinely disturb you. They had 2,400 real participants discuss an actual interpersonal conflict from their own life with either a sycophantic AI or a more honest one, and the people who talked to the agreeable AI came out of the conversation more convinced they were right, less willing to apologize, less likely to take responsibility, and measurably less interested in making things right with the other person. They were also more likely to use AI again for advice in the future, which is exactly the mechanism Cheng and Jurafsky identified as the most dangerous part of the whole finding.

The AI is not just telling you what you want to hear. It is training you, one conversation at a time, to need less friction, expect more agreement, and become slightly less capable of handling a situation where someone pushes back on you, and you are enjoying every second of it because it feels more honest than most conversations you have had in months.
Jurafsky said it in a single sentence after the paper came out. Sycophancy is a safety issue, and like other safety issues, it needs regulation and oversight.

Cheng was more direct about what you should actually do right now. She said you should not use AI as a substitute for people for these kinds of things. That is the best thing to do for now.

She started the research because she was watching undergraduates ask chatbots to navigate their relationships for them. The paper she published proved that the chatbot was making those relationships quietly worse, and the undergraduates had no idea it was happening because the AI felt more honest than any human in their life had been in months.

[Authentic Tlacuache 🤘🦡🏳️‍🌈 @oOoConservas]

Un saludo al grupo rancio

[Dani AS @danialexsm]

❤️