@Maks_NAFO_FELLA Every airport fueling capacity ahould be targetted. Give that Europe is unable to enact sanctions and cancel visas, Ukraine should do so.
Ruzzians cannot go back to having a normal life after raping, murdering and terrorizing free Ukraine.
@DarthPutinKGB@AgnesCallamard She is competing with Gianni Infantano on who's the most corrupt. At least one is corrupted over games, Agnes is morally corrupt
@vonderleyen@NATO What's there to discuss? It's been 4 years of discussing.
Severe all and any ties with ruzzia. Stop issuing visas and halt ruzzians from entering Europe. Stop all and any trade. Close the Ukranian airspace. Relieve the UAF logistics with boots on the ground.
@brianlilley Seeing it from this angle it becomes even further clear that the "slight" deviation made Renato miss his own header.
And while everyone focus on contesting facts, no one seems to even consider this happenned at minute 103!! The play should not even have started, game was over.
@Zigmanfreud Then, the previous offside on portugal should not have been allowed?
And what was the intent on the discretionary decision to extend the match to minute 103, allowing the contested play to even exist?
@Waspapping_ The biggest robber would have been to score 13m after the 90, 4m after compensation over.
The play should not have existed. And even if it does, the ball does change trajectory.
@Harneetsin Croatia would just tie, how would Portugal deserve to lose?
A sudden love of Mourinho's style of counter attacking is amazing to observe!
The robbery would have been to score a goal 13m after the 90, 4m after the end of compensation. The play should not have existed.
@MartinLitwak Because everyone thinks it's an hair, but in reality it was not hair, it was a change of direction in the balls trajectory, as can be seen on images.
Hatred of Portugal is biasing rational judgment.
@_common_w2 Worst part nobody talks about is that the plat starts at 13m past the 90m, 3m after the compensation defined by the referee.
It's pure hatred of Portugal, who won fair and square
@fdbedout And of course you want to believe it was the hair, however, it wasn't - it was a touch of the head that changed the ball's trajectory. Whether enough or not, that's the same as the milimetric offsides.
@GeronimoMorgans One: the ball changed direction, it does not matter if slightly.
Two: the play was taking place 13m beyond regular time, 3 minutes after the compensation determined by the referee.
Crazy how people are discussing facts from technology, not caring about the subjectiveness before
@PawlowskiMario If you want to have conspiracy theories, one should discuss how play continued for 13 minutes beyond the 90m...
The game should have been over by then.