@mikhail_golubev @muisback88 @MagnusCarlsen Mamedov said he almost got banned for resigning vs Carlsen on move two. I doubt https://t.co/yURqQBqfb6 would be that stupid for at least one reason. I doubt anyone who has been following the Carlsen - Niemann controversy needs me to explain it to them.
@okaynaia @SlimHeroics If you are not committed before marriage then a piece of paper is not going to suddenly make you committed. Your heart is loyal or it isn't.
@MagnusCarlsen An idea I came up with years ago is to add another feature to chess. That is if a player occupies both of the opponents 'Royal squares' for a full move it is a win. The old rules still apply so you could also win by checkmate.
@StephenAtHome there is a big difference between simply insulting someone and tweeting political, moral, philosophical content. Study logic, reasoning, and critical thinking Colbert.
@GeorgeTakei I think Trump is a wacko but every time someone does something like this why isn't it obvious to people that it's a lot more complicated than they make it seem? For one thing things like this violate basic logic and reasoning principles. Prove the correlations.
@Vladimir_Kramni Hi I have an idea for less drawish chess. A win is achieved by the usual checkmate or by occupying both of the 'royal' squares for one move.
@carl0s94 @DeepMindAI@gmmds Lc0 beat SF 10 in SuFi 15 53.5-46.5. If Lc0 can do that then certainly AZ can do it. Also AZ TRAINS using a super computer but it does NOT use super hardware when competing.