Another Gold mine for my UI/UX people.🥂
I got a lot of request for UI/UX, as much as I would recommend going for a paid course for in-depth understanding. You can start with this, I know I did and it helped.💃🏽✨
https://t.co/SF0roN50GL
If you’re looking to learn GRAPHIC DESIGN, LOGO DESIGN, PHOTOSHOP, ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR, PORTFOLIOS CREATION
Here’s a fully loaded MATERIAL for you, all for FREE.
Share with DESIGNERS on the TL.
https://t.co/Ous1iQCfz4
I found a Design Goldmineeee 💃🏽✨
Photoshop free course from beginner to advanced level!!!!
Here’s the link for those interested! ⬇️
https://t.co/MHCvtvDXCr
I decided to take a look at @emberprotocol's vault numbers today and now I can't stop running the math
Their Walrus vault is showing 61% APY, concentrated liquidity at 31% and even the conservative USD vault is pushing 14%
These aren't memecoin farm numbers. These are institutional-grade vaults on Sui that went from $13M to $70M in two months. Over 30,000 depositors. Audited. Curated by pros
So where is this yield actually coming from?
I started my research because in November 2025, most DeFi yields are compressed. Aave's giving you 4-6% on stables. Compound's similar. Even aggressive leverage strategies on Ethereum are struggling to push past 12% after gas costs
Yet Ember's pulling 14% on basic USD strategies and 61% on more complex plays. The math has to work somehow
I found out that their vaults aren't just doing one thing. The Bitcoin vault allocates 60% to lending, takes 20% in strategic borrows for capital efficiency, and deploys 20% into AMM liquidity pools. They rebalance daily based on market conditions
On Ethereum, this strategy would be expensive. Every rebalance costs $30-80 in gas. Do that daily and you've eaten most of your returns
But Sui processes transactions in under 400 milliseconds with near-zero costs. This means Ember can actually execute the strategy as designed instead of compromising due to fees
Still doesn't fully explain 61% though
I think the missing piece is in the strategy complexity. The Walrus vault and Concentrated Liquidity vaults are doing things like perp funding rate arbitrage, cross-protocol yield stacking, and automated position management that would be economically impossible on older chains
When they say "curated by top-tier strategists," they mean people who can spot 2-3% inefficiencies across five different protocols and stack them without destroying returns on gas
But here's the part that keeps me up: these yields are sustainable until they're not. High APYs attract capital. Capital compresses yields. It's DeFi gravity
Ember went from $13.34M in mid-September to $70.3M now. That's over 5x in less than two months. As more capital flows in, these strategies will either need to find new yield sources or accept compression
The protocol has generated $30k in revenue in this quarter with annualized fees around $5.24M. That's real protocol economics, not just ponzi emissions.
The yields are real. The growth is real. The infrastructure makes sense. But 31-61% APY doesn't come from nowhere. It comes with liquidation exposure across multiple protocols, bridge dependencies, and smart contract risk stacking
The question isn't whether Ember works. It clearly does. The question is whether most people depositing actually understand what their capital is doing behind the scenes
Are you using any of Ember's vaults? If not, why?
Let me tell you about a problem nobody talks about in DeFi
You’ve got capital sitting in stables. Doesn’t matter if it’s $1K or $100K. You want it working efficiently
So you start looking around:
Arbitrum has a 10% APY pool. Polygon offers 12%. Base has something at 9% but lower fees. Plasma just launched with competitive rates and zero-fee stablecoin transfers
Now you have a choice: pick one chain and accept suboptimal returns, or split your capital across 4 chains and manage 4 different positions
Option 1 = leaving money on the table
Option 2 = death by a thousand bridges, gas fees, and UI tabs
>>>This is the actual problem
Not “we need better tech.” Not “we need higher APYs.”
The problem is: capital is multi-chain, but infrastructure forces you to pick sides
Enter @ploutos_money (and why I think their approach is interesting)
They didn’t build a new consensus mechanism or invent novel tokenomics. They took @aave v3, literally the most battle-tested lending code in DeFi and deployed it strategically across 6 chains
Same protocol. Same interface. Different chains
You want to lend on Plasma? Done
Prefer Arbitrum because that’s where your ETH already is? Works there too
Got Bitcoin-backed assets on @hemi_xyz ? Supported
No bridging required. No learning new UIs. No fragmented experience
>>>But here’s where it gets interesting: LEVERAGE.
Most people stop at “earn yield.” But if you understand capital efficiency, you realize lending protocols are just the starting point
Deposit $20K USDC. Borrow $10K USDC against it. Now you’re farming with $30K. If your farming APY beats your borrow cost, you’re earning more without deploying more capital
This is leverage. And when done right; conservative ratios, stable assets, proper risk management, it’s not gambling. It’s math
Ploutos is designed for exactly this. Over-collateralized borrowing with liquidation protections. Built for people who farm yields, not chase pumps
>>>Who should care?
If you’re managing capital across multiple chains already, this simplifies your life
If you’re earning 8-10% on stables and thinking “that’s it?”, leveraged strategies can push that to 12-15% without extreme risk
If you’re tired of protocols telling you to “just bridge everything to our chain bro”, you’ll appreciate the flexibility
And if you’re already farming? Season 1 points are live
Supply or borrow = earn points. Points = airdrop eligibility
Simple as that
Details here: https://t.co/Bs6zYA8ryh
>>>The bigger picture:
DeFi’s liquidity is fragmented. That’s not changing. Different chains will continue optimizing for different things
The winning protocols won’t be the ones that force consolidation. They’ll be the ones that adapt to fragmentation
Ploutos is betting on that thesis. Proven code, strategic deployment, user-first design
Early stages, but the logic is sound
Worth checking out if you’re serious about multi-chain yield:
https://t.co/oRhRaKZbz8
Daily Attendance Check @multiplifi ✅
Mark Your attendance If you’re:
▪️ Bullish on multipli
▪️ Preaching the gospel of Multipli
▪️ Replying under every Multipli post
Then stand up, soldier… you’re gMultipli
Marked my attendance. Mark yours
gMultipli ✨
Daily Attendance Check @multiplifi ✅
Mark Your attendance If you’re:
▪️ Bullish on multipli
▪️ Preaching the gospel of Multipli
▪️ Replying under every Multipli post
Then stand up, soldier… you’re gMultipli
Marked my attendance. Mark yours
gMultipli ✨