Former AUSA. Corporate investigations and trial lawyer. The views expressed are my own and do not necessarily reflect those of Covington or its clients.
@dylanotes Former corruption prosecutor here. The answer is no. Not even close. If you withdraw your support from a candidate who takes a position you don't like, that's called speech, not a bribe. See 18 USC 201. To insinuate otherwise is unfair and reckless. You should take this down.
@jonfavs Lifelong Democrat. Longtime listener to PSA going back to the Keeping it 1600 days. I fundraised for and supported your former boss back in 2007. You've lost me. You platformed this guy. Let him lie over and over, with almost no pushback. That's embarrassing.
@EYakoby Did you watch the clip? He did not say what you claim he said. He did not claim to have brought down the rate of antisemitic incidents. Apparently, Eyal, you can make it up. This is a cheap shot against someone who has fought tirelessly against antisemitism. Do better.
"The shocking evidence...shows that SAUSD deliberately tried to keep the public in the dark about the extreme biases and antisemitism that infected the District's ethnic studies curriculum. In doing so, SAUSD violated State law,” said Dan Shallman, lead counsel from Covington.
This is the impact of @ADL and our partners: Bringing evidence to light about a California school district’s intent to exclude Jews from critical school board discussions. We’re fighting in the courts to protect all students from antisemitic lies infusing the classroom.
New evidence in our lawsuit against @SantaAnaUSD further reveals antisemitic intent and shows how the Board kept proposed ethnic studies courses “under the radar,” even suggesting holding meetings on Jewish holidays to prevent community comment, referring to Jews as “oppressors” and “racist Zionists.” Read more: https://t.co/L1M6nkpQvj
One podcast with four co-hosts does not speak for the entire technology industry.
Thanks to @vcsforkamala for giving those of us who will vote for her in November a way to counter the false narrative that “tech is for Trump”.
As President Biden announces that he will not seek reelection, it is important to remember the President’s deep commitment and love for Israel and the Jewish people. The citizens of Israel will always revere President Biden as a true friend, a leader who, even in the face of virulent opposition, defined himself as a Zionist.
As someone who had the privilege of working closely with him, I can attest that his love for Israel was heartfelt. Despite occasional policy disagreements, that love never once diminished.
Biden’s decision is characteristic of the man who, for more than a half century, in the senate and in the White House, faithfully served the American people and freedom-loving peoples throughout the world.
All I can say now—and say it in the name of all Israelis—is Todah Rabbah, President Biden, thank you.
@Jewtastic@HenMazzig This is false. If you want to support the lawless maniac who praises the Charlottesville Nazis, dined with Nick Fuentes and Kanye, and bends the knee to the leading supporter of the Iranian regime (Putin), you do you. But don’t pretend to be “jewtastic.” https://t.co/MOnweU7Vd4
My fellow Democrats, I have decided not to accept the nomination and to focus all my energies on my duties as President for the remainder of my term. My very first decision as the party nominee in 2020 was to pick Kamala Harris as my Vice President. And it’s been the best decision I’ve made. Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year. Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump. Let’s do this.
With antisemitic incidents in K-12 schools rising significantly, we're increasingly hearing from families in need of legal help. We're proud to be starting this new pilot in California with @brandeiscenter and @StandWithUs, and we look toward expanding.
Bottom line for this former public corruption prosecutor: if DOJ determines it has admissible evidence that will "probably be sufficient to obtain and sustain a conviction," I believe it will prosecute FPOTUS for J6 related offenses and/or #MarALago. 17/17
🧵THREAD: In the months ahead, @TheJusticeDept will face two critical decisions: (1) is there sufficient evidence to prosecute FPOTUS?; and (2) if there is, should DOJ bring a case? 1/17
Take a look at the other factors DOJ must consider in weighing an indictment. None of them bode well for the former President. https://t.co/fzhsNorfj1 16/17